FANDOM


 
Line 3: Line 3:
 
Golem, you need to take care to ensure that what you are writing is fact and not biased in any way, shape, or form. Also, there is no need to explain where you got your information from IN THE ARTICLE, as that completely ruins the article. Also, instead of getting angry when other people undo your edits and undoing the undo, look hard at why your edit was undone in the first place. People rarely undo edits on this wiki without good reason. If you still genuinely believe after thinking about your edit that it shouldn't have been undone, feel free to consult other users, or even better, the person who undid your edits. That can really be helpful sometimes.
 
Golem, you need to take care to ensure that what you are writing is fact and not biased in any way, shape, or form. Also, there is no need to explain where you got your information from IN THE ARTICLE, as that completely ruins the article. Also, instead of getting angry when other people undo your edits and undoing the undo, look hard at why your edit was undone in the first place. People rarely undo edits on this wiki without good reason. If you still genuinely believe after thinking about your edit that it shouldn't have been undone, feel free to consult other users, or even better, the person who undid your edits. That can really be helpful sometimes.
   
And BHC, you also should remember to take good looks at edits before you undo them, because who knows, they could have an inkling of truth in them. Sometimes bad edits would be better off with a rewrite or simply grammar corrections rather than be undone. Also, although I know you mean well, you need to be careful to watch your words to avoid sounding prideful.
+
And BHC, you also should remember to take good looks at edits before you undo them, because who knows, they could have an inkling of truth in them. Sometimes bad edits would be better off with a rewrite or simply grammar corrections rather than be undone. If you do undo them, an explanatory edit summary would be very helpful. Also, although I know you mean well, you need to be careful to watch your words to avoid sounding prideful.
   
 
That is all. I hope you guys can put aside your differences for the good of the wiki.
 
That is all. I hope you guys can put aside your differences for the good of the wiki.

Latest revision as of 11:20, March 31, 2015

Alright, this has gone long enough. I'm gonna close this thread, but first I want 55golem and BHCreations to settle their differences.

Golem, you need to take care to ensure that what you are writing is fact and not biased in any way, shape, or form. Also, there is no need to explain where you got your information from IN THE ARTICLE, as that completely ruins the article. Also, instead of getting angry when other people undo your edits and undoing the undo, look hard at why your edit was undone in the first place. People rarely undo edits on this wiki without good reason. If you still genuinely believe after thinking about your edit that it shouldn't have been undone, feel free to consult other users, or even better, the person who undid your edits. That can really be helpful sometimes.

And BHC, you also should remember to take good looks at edits before you undo them, because who knows, they could have an inkling of truth in them. Sometimes bad edits would be better off with a rewrite or simply grammar corrections rather than be undone. If you do undo them, an explanatory edit summary would be very helpful. Also, although I know you mean well, you need to be careful to watch your words to avoid sounding prideful.

That is all. I hope you guys can put aside your differences for the good of the wiki.

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.