Smashpedia
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 14: Line 14:
 
: TBH, the better question is whether the SWF staff want this nonsense on their wiki. This is a family site, after all, and any content about sniffing panties, vaginas, sex, etc etc etc might not be welcome by KirbyKing, Gideon et al. After all, Gideon '''owns''' this wiki and everything on it, so he has final say about what can be here. --[[User:Nealdt|nealdt]] 21:55, November 17, 2006 (GMT)
 
: TBH, the better question is whether the SWF staff want this nonsense on their wiki. This is a family site, after all, and any content about sniffing panties, vaginas, sex, etc etc etc might not be welcome by KirbyKing, Gideon et al. After all, Gideon '''owns''' this wiki and everything on it, so he has final say about what can be here. --[[User:Nealdt|nealdt]] 21:55, November 17, 2006 (GMT)
 
::Probably they don't want. Also, userpages shouldn't be created for users who don't exist on the wiki. &ndash; [[User:AltAcnt|Smiddle]] / <small>[[User talk:AltAcnt|talk]]</small> 18:38, November 20, 2006 (GMT)
 
::Probably they don't want. Also, userpages shouldn't be created for users who don't exist on the wiki. &ndash; [[User:AltAcnt|Smiddle]] / <small>[[User talk:AltAcnt|talk]]</small> 18:38, November 20, 2006 (GMT)
  +
  +
Very valid points, I would have to very much agree. [[User:Lanowen|Lanowen]] 00:57, November 21, 2006 (GMT)

Revision as of 00:57, 21 November 2006

How does this page relate to the SSB games? – Smiddle / talk 15:15, November 15, 2006 (GMT)

erm....snex is a smasher.....and he discusses these things on dc++.....but this really doesn't have anything to do with smash at all. consider it informally nominated for deletion. --MaskedMarth 17:29, November 15, 2006 (GMT)

I don't think this page should be deleted. He is a smasher and this, in essence, is his page. Other smashers have their page, why not just call this HIS page? Lanowen 12:22, November 17, 2006 (GMT)

that's what user pages are for. User:MaskedMarth is my user page, and i can do whatever i like with it - talk about girls, smash, ddr, singing, why super monkey ball is the only good 1-player gamecube game, why i dislike the term "mindgames," redirection, whatever my interests may be. "MaskedMarth" the article, if it existed, would be about me as a smasher, and would document my contributions to the smash scene (posting at gfaqs, losing at tournaments, generally being a nuisance, et cetera), and would not simply be a litany of quips and self-promotion. --MaskedMarth 15:03, November 17, 2006 (GMT)

Good point, but I still find it a shame to delete this page, is it possible to move the previous verson to Snex's page? I looked at it once a while back and it looked like it had a lot of info on it, even though it wasn't pertaining to Smash, but snex is part of the smash scene IMO. Lanowen 20:21, November 17, 2006 (GMT)

IMO, it would be best to just make a user page for snex and include info about him there. Then, if you really want people to see this thing, then you can put it on there, or make a link to another site that contains it. Making a page about something like this shouldn't be directly included into Smashwiki, it doesn't have much to do with smash bros. Rather include it in some other way, as in on his user page or in the form of a link to another site that has it on there.
Normal pages should include info about smash bros., and user pages should include personal information or whatever else you want to say about that person/whatever else that they want to say about themselves.--Respawn 20:52, November 17, 2006 (GMT)

TBH, the better question is whether the SWF staff want this nonsense on their wiki. This is a family site, after all, and any content about sniffing panties, vaginas, sex, etc etc etc might not be welcome by KirbyKing, Gideon et al. After all, Gideon owns this wiki and everything on it, so he has final say about what can be here. --nealdt 21:55, November 17, 2006 (GMT)
Probably they don't want. Also, userpages shouldn't be created for users who don't exist on the wiki. – Smiddle / talk 18:38, November 20, 2006 (GMT)

Very valid points, I would have to very much agree. Lanowen 00:57, November 21, 2006 (GMT)