m (→Delete?) |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
'''Delete''' - This is simply worthless speculation. - [[User:Pokemon DP|Pokemon DP]] |
'''Delete''' - This is simply worthless speculation. - [[User:Pokemon DP|Pokemon DP]] |
||
:Then the Ganondorf article should go, too? The only proof we have for him being in Brawl is that same interview. [[User:Teamrocketspy621|Teamrocketspy621]] 15:21, October 24, 2007 (EDT) |
:Then the Ganondorf article should go, too? The only proof we have for him being in Brawl is that same interview. [[User:Teamrocketspy621|Teamrocketspy621]] 15:21, October 24, 2007 (EDT) |
||
| + | |||
| + | ::True.--<font color="000023">'''[[User:Randall00|RJM]]'''</font> <sup>''[[User talk:Randall00|Talk]]''</sup> 16:33, October 24, 2007 (EDT) |
||
Revision as of 20:33, 24 October 2007
Link? WaluigiIsAwesome 22:42, August 3, 2007 (EDT)
- Never mind, found one. WaluigiIsAwesome 02:57, August 4, 2007 (EDT)
- That does not prove Shiek is in Brawl. This article SHOULD BE DELETED! Johnknight1, 1:22, 7 Ocotber, 2007 (PCT)
Delete?
Anybody wanna explain why the UK version of the DOJO!! characters page proves that Sheik's page here is null and void, whereas Ganondorf's has had the entire Brawl section of the interview added to it? It doesn't make any sense to me -- especially when we have Sheik's alter ego confirmed, but absolutely nothing on Ganondorf other than that interveiw. Teamrocketspy621 15:36, October 23, 2007 (EDT)
Delete - Sigh. Obviously. The reason the DOJO character page is cited is to illustrate that the interview is a totally unreliable source for CONFIRMED character appearances and recommend that we all refer to said website for clarification as to what characters will be returning. --RJM Talk 15:54, October 23, 2007 (EDT) Delete - This is simply worthless speculation. - Pokemon DP
- Then the Ganondorf article should go, too? The only proof we have for him being in Brawl is that same interview. Teamrocketspy621 15:21, October 24, 2007 (EDT)