this article about the controversy seems very clearly take one side. You're not supposed to. --65.87.242.28 15:51, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
- You're right, it lists more cons than pros. The problem is, "it's equal and balanced" pretty much sums up the "pro" argument. I've added a cleanup tag to see what can be done, but it seems like the only way to fix it is to shorten the "cons" listed. SD706/FnW - (U•T•C ) 01:21, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
controversy[]
I personally think the battle field is better for tournaments if not for its small size, but just give it a rest.
Scoobford (talk) 01:24, July 31, 2010 (UTC)
- This is not an appropriate talk page discussion. Doctor Pain 99 (CTE)
03:25, July 31, 2010 (UTC)
Stub?--NetNavi (talk) 17:49, August 22, 2014 (UTC)