This page is for requesting that one is granted rollback powers on SmashWiki.
Rules
- Only self-nominations are allowed.
- All new nominees should post their name below as a in a level 3 header (===Username===). Underneath, the user should state why he/she would like to be granted Rollback powers.
- Users who wish to support, oppose, or comment on the nomination may do so underneath the person requesting Rollback powers.
- After sufficient time has passed to allow all users who wish to express an opinion the chance to do so, a decision will be made based on community consensus as to whether or not the request will succeed. Once a decision has been made, the discussion will be archived and moved to an appropriate subpage.
Archives
- Bek The Conqueror
- Blue Ninjakoopa
- Charitwo
- Cheezperson
- ClonedPickle
- Defiant Elements
- Enigmatic Mr. L
- Fried beef1
- GalaxiaD
- GT5162
- Gutripper
- HavocReaper48
- JtM
- KP317
- L33tSilvie
- MarioGalaxy
- Miles.oppenheimer
- Oxico
- ParaGoomba348
- PenguinofDeath
- Pikamander2
- RAN1
- Semicolon
- Shadowcrest
- Smorekingxg456
- Solar Dragon
- The Blue Blur
- Toomai
- Toon Ganondorf
- Y462
Current Requests
KoRoBeNiKi
Hello, everybody. I am KoRoBeNiKi and I am requesting rollback rights. I have made many edits, mostly specifically for the n64 and competitive side of smash. A large amount of my edits are reverting vandalism or creating new articles and I have nominated articles for deletion and helped multiple users before. I am personally wanting rollback to allow myself to edit this wiki better and keep this website to be a great resource of smash information while reverting vandalism. --KoRoBeNiKi (talk) 17:41, January 6, 2010 (UTC)
Support
- User positively edits the wiki and follows policies. Frankly, I don't care about anything else. I am confident that KoRo won't abuse the tool and only good can come from granting it to him, so I see no reason for this not to pass. Shadowcrest 20:27, January 6, 2010 (UTC)
- What Shadowcrest said, tbh. PenguinofDeath 20:57, January 6, 2010 (UTC)
Oppose
- Oppose: While you've been here for very long, I see no reason as to why we should give you rollback yet. First of all, creating new articles, nominating articles for deletion, and aiding users cannot be helped at all by the rollback tool. As for vandalism-reverting, I have not seen you make any reverts of vandalism within your past 200 edits. If I am mistaken, please correct me by presenting some links to the reverts that you've made, but until then I do not believe that you deserve rollback. RAN1 20:06, January 6, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose, leaning towards Neutral. Well, to put RAN's opposition nicely.... Rollback is really for people with a decent revert-count, and being a bit more active on the wiki would be nice. We just need a bit more proof of how good you are with reverting edits, that's all. HavocReaper48 20:15, January 6, 2010 (UTC)
Neutral
- Neutral, leaning towards support As the other say, haven't really seen much vandalism reverts from you but your edits seem to be positive but you just need to revert more vandalism. ☆The Solar Dragon (Happy New Year)☆ 21:07, January 6, 2010 (UTC)
- Neutral, leaning to support While you do not have a high amount of reverts, you do contribute. ClonedPickle 22:07, January 6, 2010 (UTC)
Comments
- ...