Result: Well, I'm going to say the same thing that Terrance said to Phillip when Phillip asked him if he thought that the Beatles were a good band. Clarinet Hawk (talk · contributions) 04:25, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

Archive.png This page is an archive. Do not edit the contents of this page. Direct any additional comments to the current talk page.


Heyz, it's Toomai. Well, I decided it's about time for me to apply for rollback. I patrol the Recent Changes with regularity, not to mention the Random Page redirect, so any vandals are likely to be blunted quickly. I've already done a decent amount of vandal-punting, and rollback can only make it easier (there are a few times where I had to do some gruntwork to undo a string of edits). So...there we go. Toomai Glittershine eXemplary Logic 22:02, 25 April 2009 (UTC)


  • Support You are active and want to help revert vandalism so there is no reason to not give you rollback. GT5162 (talk) 22:24, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Support 20 reverts shows that you will be able to use the tool, as you do in fact revert stuff.--Bek (talk) 22:42, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Support. uzer haz revertz.Smoreking(T) (c) 23:05, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Support You have a good amount of reverts, which is good enough for me. Y462 (TCE ) 23:09, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Support as per all of the above --Shadowcrest 23:47, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Ye - Per everyone above. Blue Ninjakoopa 00:37, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Support You don't vandal and you do positive work. ClonedPickle 01:14, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Support Active editor whose contributions reflect a willingness to revert vandalism. – Defiant Elements +talk 03:03, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.