Archive This page is an archive. Do not edit the contents of this page. Direct any additional comments to the current talk page.
Result of RfR: Failed primarily due to user inactivity. (Non-bureaucrat close.) Miles (talk) 00:12, 22 January 2009 (UTC)


I am Oxico. I have been a vivid editor to this wiki since before the time it was in Wikia. Now, I could say how I created almost all the Final Smash pages and provided the damage percentages. I could also tell you how I beefed up almost all the movesets. I could also drone on and on about how I have made more than 1500 edits to the main wiki. But, being humble, I will not brag. Instead, I will provde a link to a list of all my contributions to the main namespace, because I know actions speak louder than words.


  • Why do you deserve rollback for just that? Rollback is for reverting vandalism, and while all that extra stuff is a plus, you really wouldn't need it for making over 1500 edits. KP317 (talk) 20:30, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Support. You've been gone a lot lately, but when you are online, you are really helping the Wiki. This is not biased. JtM =^] (talk) 21:01, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Support. You're active, and that's all that counts for this in my opinion. Cheezperson {talk}stuff 23:36, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Support. You were put on hold for your request for sysop (seriously, when will they get back on track?), so you at least deserve a chance. MarioGalaxy {talk} 23:49, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Support ^pikamander --Shadowcrest 23:40, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

I move for this request to be closed with the result as "promotion" due to the fact that he's gotten nothing but support for the past 2 weeks.

I've noticed that he opposed all the RfRs up, but I failed to realize how that mattered. Because it doesn't. --Shadowcrest 20:34, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
Of course you agree with him. You'll try and ruin everything you can. Why? It simply makes you feel good. A common slice of evidence that you're an evil person in general. =| Claus 20:49, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
  1. If you can't recognize that was a NPA violation then you have a serious problem.
  2. If you would actually read what I wrote, then you would notice that- unlike DE- I supported Oxico. I merely posted to make it quite plain that saying "Anyone notice how he opposes everything?" is not a valid way to refute his (or any) argument, and it never will be. --Shadowcrest 21:58, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
LOL WUT Koopa Koopersshell Klaus 22:06, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

I Move For Close In Support. KP317 (talk) 19:36, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

Oppose. Defiant Elements.SZLUP/T 01:23, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.