Changes: Smashpedia:Requests for adminship/Thiefery4

Latest revision as of 21:00, 29 July 2014

The following discussion is an archived debate of the nomination of a user for adminship. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

Failed Reasoning: Lack of experience, candidate is unqualified --Shadow crest (Non-bureaucrat closure)

Thiefery4 (talk • contribs • edit count • RFA page)

Please direct all discussions to the talk page.

Candidate, please summarize why you are running for adminship below.

Hi, I'm Thiefery4. I am a n00b but if I am promoted to a sysop then I will be able to really help out hear!! Please support me!!!!![[User:Thiefery4|The Thief]]:Thiefery4|I steal ]] (talk) 19:13, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Support

...

Oppose

You're supposed to prove that you deserve adminship and then request it, not the other way around. --Shadow crest 19:16, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
Joey, this is a critical fail. You've made a bare minimum number of edits to the main namespace, and those were saying "young link is the best mad top tier." or something similar.Smoreking^(T)_(c) 19:18, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
You only have two mainspace edits and most of your edits have been on user talk pages. Besides, its not a good idea to run for adminship when you are relatively new here. Cloned Pickle 19:19, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
lolno - Per the two above me. Blue Ninjakoopa 19:33, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
Oppose. I'd explain my reasoning, but it'd be redundant to the above. Miles (talk) 19:40, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
You argue a pretty strong case...for why I shouldn't support you. No edits, no experiance, and a self-proclaimed noob. As if. Oppose. Gutripper ^Speak 20:16, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
Strong Oppose User cannot zpell. Also, I don't know who you are. Toon Ganondorf (t c) 20:22, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Neutral

...

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+<div class="boilerplate metadata" style="background-color: #F3F9FF;  margin: 3em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAA;">
-=== [[User:Thiefery4|Thiefery4]] ([[User talk:Thiefery4|talk]] &bull; [[Special:Contributions/Thiefery4|contribs]] &bull; [[Special:Editcount/Thiefery4|edit count]] &bull; [[SmashWiki:Requests for adminship/Username|RFA page]]) ===
+:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the nomination of a user for adminship. <span style="color: red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> No further edits should be made to this page.''
-''Please direct all discussions to the [[SmashWiki talk:Requests for adminship/Username|talk page]].
+<!-- inserted with: template:rfa close -->
+'''Failed''' Reasoning: Lack of experience, candidate is unqualified  --<span style="font-family:vivaldi; font-size:12pt">[[User:Shadowcrest|<span style="color:#4682b4">Shadow</span>]][[User talk:Shadowcrest|<span style="color:#4682b4;">crest</span>]]</span> <small>''(Non-bureaucrat closure)''</small>
+=== [[User:Thiefery4|Thiefery4]] ([[User talk:Thiefery4|talk]] &bull; [[Special:Contributions/Thiefery4|contribs]] &bull; [[Special:Editcount/Thiefery4|edit count]] &bull; [[SmashWiki:Requests for adminship/Thiefery4|RFA page]]) ===
+''Please direct all discussions to the [[SmashWiki talk:Requests for adminship/Thiefery4|talk page]].
@@ Line 13: / Line 18: @@
 *You're supposed to prove that you deserve adminship and then request it, not the other way around.  --<span style="font-family:vivaldi; font-size:12pt">[[User:Shadowcrest|<span style="color:#4682b4">Shadow</span>]][[User talk:Shadowcrest|<span style="color:#4682b4;">crest</span>]]</span> 19:16, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
 *Joey, this is a critical fail. You've made a bare minimum number of edits to the main namespace, and those were saying "young link is the best mad top tier." or something similar.'''[[User:Smorekingxg456|<span style="color:#5F9EA0">Smoreking</span>]]<small><sup>[[User Talk:Smorekingxg456#Top|<span style="color:#00FF00">(T)</span>]]</sup></small><small><sub> [[Special:Contributions/Smorekingxg456|(c)]]</sub></small>''' 19:18, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
+*You only have two mainspace edits and most of your edits have been on user talk pages.  Besides, its not a good idea to run for adminship when you are relatively new here. '''[[User:ClonedPickle|<span style="color:DarkTurquoise">Cloned</span>]][[User talk:ClonedPickle|<span style="color:DarkGreen">Pickle</span>]]''' 19:19, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
+*'''lolno''' - Per the two above me. <span style="border:2px outset #33ff66;background-color:green;-moz-border-radius:3px">'''[[User:Blue Ninjakoopa|<span style="color:#99ff99;">Blue</span>]] [[User talk:Blue Ninjakoopa|<span style="color:#99ff99">Ninjakoopa</span>]]'''</span> 19:33, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
+*'''''Oppose'''''.  I'd explain my reasoning, but it'd be redundant to the above. [[User:Miles.oppenheimer|<font color="forestgreen"><span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS;">'''Miles''']] <font color="lime">([[User talk:Miles.oppenheimer|<font color="lime">talk]])</font></font></span></font> 19:40, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
+*You argue a pretty strong case...for why I shouldn't support you. No edits, no experiance, and a self-proclaimed noob. As if. '''Oppose'''. '''<span style="font-family:Lucida Calligraphy; font-size:8pt">[[User:Gutripper|<span style="color:orange">Gutripper</span>]][[User Talk:Gutripper|<small><sup><span style="color:Black">Speak</span></sup></small>]]</span>''' 20:16, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
+*'''Strong Oppose''' User cannot zpell. Also, I don't know who you are. '''[[User:Toon Ganondorf|<span style="color:green">Toon</span> <span style="color:purple">Ganondorf</span>]]   [[User Talk:Toon Ganondorf|<span style="color:Gold">(t</span>]]  [[Special:Contributions/Toon Ganondorf|<span style="color:Gold">c)</span>]]''' 20:22, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
 ==== Neutral ====
@@ Line 19: / Line 29: @@
 <!-- Do NOT make comments below this comment or the ---- below! It is there to separate RfAs if more than one is on the page at a time! -->
 ----
-[[Category:Administration]]
+[[Category:Failed RfAs|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]