These seems like a silly category. Do we really need a grouping of every single "useful" move in the game? What does "useful" mean, anyways? --nealdt 18:07, August 2, 2006 (GMT)
I had a long self-debate over what to name this category and this is the best I could come up with. If you want to change the name, please, please do. My general idea was to include moves that are powerful enough to change the very nature of the character using them, perhaps accounting themselves for a rise in tier position (coughshinecough) or usage of that character (Ness, anyone?). --ycz12
- But why do we need this category? Is it useful to anyone to have a vague list of moves that may or may not change the very nature of a character? Is it necessary to note outside of Shine (Fox) that the move is probably responsible for making him so high on the tier list? I'm not trying to be a jerk, I'm just trying to keep this wiki slim and to the point. --nealdt 06:04, August 3, 2006 (GMT)
- Eh, I don't know; I just thought it might be useful to have a categorized list of commonly cited attacks whose significance may not be immediately obvious to the layman. ycz12
- Well-known or Common Moves might hit the mark a little better. I'm putting the knee in this category too. --MaskedMarth 09:30, October 8, 2006 (GMT)
- I think "attacks" has this category covered, and the reader can infer from each article whether the attack is "useful" or not. I removed the articles from this category. --MaskedMarth 19:57, November 7, 2006 (GMT)