User talk:Clarinet Hawk/Archive 6

Vandals
'''Please list the names/IP's of potential vandals here. Also, if possible, tell me the page(s) they vandalized so that I can verify the claim and assess the damage. Clarinet Hawk (talk · contributions) 02:20, 28 June 2008 (UTC)'''

Perma-ban this IP. His last ban ended today and he just started up again. Miles (talk - contribs) 23:14, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Aw man, it's the same guy? Man, he's probably the guy I called a fr... Sorry, BNK got banned because of that. Anyway, I agree with Miles, we kept reverting this guy's edits while you guys were in school/college (last month or earlier). Ban him.  Mario Galaxy  { talk } 23:18, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
 * is vandal. --Shadow crest 01:22, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Seriously, ban him. Please.  He's been nothing but trouble for the past hour or so.   Cheez person  { talk } stuff ''' 01:23, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Can u ban this annoying IP? Special:Contributions/162.83.114.18 Thanks. Mas ter man What's the matter?   Scared?

This person is a vandal account. Please ban it for life.  Cheez person  { talk } stuff ''' 02:36, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

151.199.137.92 is a vandal account. Ban him.  IT'S A METEORITE! If you weren't crushed  10:58, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

Congrats
5 archives. Wow. By the way, JtM put a Cleanup Tag on our article, saying there was way too much stuff. Shade cleaned it up for us, removing a lot of the stuff. Now that it's cleaned up, can I remove the tag?  Mario Galaxy  { talk } 23:03, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

It would be a lot of work, but...
...should we make a separate stub template for each universe? Right now we have two, Stub and Smasher-stub. Should this happen, or is it not worth the trouble? Miles (talk - contribs) 23:18, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I think we should be able to say what info needs to added to the stub, kinda like how cleanup works. It would good for clarification if nothing else.   Cheez person  { talk } stuff ''' 23:21, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Seems like a good idea to me.  Mario Galaxy  { talk } 23:22, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Not what I meant originally. I like your idea in theory, but that's the difference between cleanup and stub: Cleanup targets one or two problems, but stub means the whole thing is too short.  It would just clutter it up.  Miles (talk - contribs) 23:31, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
 * No and no. I don't have time to explain now, but I'll get to it later.  Clarinet Hawk (talk · contributions) 01:18, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Not to seem like I'm bothering you, but I'm interested to find out what you'd think about the tentative project I'm designing. I thought it might even be possible to reword it and make it a policy, but in either case I know it still needs work. Thoughts? Also, could you please comment on my RfA? Thanks. Miles (talk - contribs) 02:46, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

CH, an anonymous source told me that you banned BNK for "multiple accounts, insults off of wiki". that is a false statement. and, you can't ban anyone for insults off the wiki! i've seen BNK level insults, but the ones the sockpuppets used are NOT him. Xtrme  Talk 2 X   Wut X is doing  18:19, 8 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Special:Log/block is an anonymous source? Oh, my mistake. It doesn't say that anywhere in the block log.


 * Oh, wait. --Sky (t · c · w) 18:49, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

I guess Cheez got banned too
User Talk:Cheezperson.

Sooooooo, yeah.O, Mighty Smoreking 19:21, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

My Tier Lists!
I didn't copy the tier lists! Those were my own! Take a look at them before you delete a page! --Riko (talk) 21:52, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

About BNK
Could you maybe remove BNK's ban? Or at least reduce it. I know you probably won't want to, but hear me out: BNK's not that bad of a guy. You see, I talk with him every day on my Proboards, and he's very friendly once you get to know him. Sure, he may lash out at his enemies, but we all have our faults. It's all a part of human nature. The man is a Christian, and a very good friend (hope that didn't religiously offend you). I'll try and make him a better person in preparation for his return. I promise you, he will be a better person by the time you get this message. Please take this request into consideration, as he is a very good contributor to the wiki. Thank you. -  GalaxiaD  Talk 00:39, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Basically all of your arguments don't matter or are outweighed, honestly :/
 * Though 3 months is a long time. --Shadow crest  00:53, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

Three months would be a long time if this wasn't the fourth time he has been banned for these same things. This time, he went so far as to not only use the wiki, but also find users outside of wikia to continue harassing them. I can't stop him from being an idiot, but I can stop him from doing it here. Him being you friend is wholly irrelevant. He is disruptive to this wiki and its users. I also don't care if this is "just who he is." I agree with that statement; that's why I blocked him. Next, his religion is completely irrelevant here. What is relevant is his behaviour. I don't care what faith he belongs to (if any) or how he practices it. All I care about is the fact that all he does on this wiki is cause strife. This is one of the very few places in the world where you are judged solely on your actions. Users have no way of knowing personal information about you unless you choose to divulge it. All we have to go on is what and how the person has contributed. In the case of BNK, I made a ruling on this irrespective of personal information. He is blocked for the next three months. If, upon his return, he continues this behaviour, he will be blocked forever. Clarinet Hawk (talk · contributions) 03:31, 11 November 2008 (UTC)