Thread:AceFedora/@comment-31581742-20191013185559/@comment-27015421-20191013202306

DBFan9000 wrote: I never done anything illegal at all

Actually, you are! The two wiki licenses operate under Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported (CC BY-SA 3.0), which means content can be shared between sites as long as proper approval or attribution is given by or to the original editors. Since you are not doing this, the copy content is in direct violation of the wiki licenses. You can learn more here: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ You are able to use Smash Wiki (and us in turn can use Smashpedia) as a starting point, but the content should not be the same.

"I don’t recall copying a page being against the rules" The very definition of plagiarism is discourteous: https://www.plagiarism.org/article/what-is-plagiarism It's essentially a jab at the original writers, you're stealing their content and passing it off as your own.

"and you cannot prove that I’ve done something illegal" The page histories. You'll notice the page on Smash Wiki was created first, and much of the content is still word-for-word.

"Do me a favor and get out of this Fandom before you make this situation even worse, newbie, and take your accusations with you." Finally, this attitude is very disrespectful and is in no way how you hold communications with fellow editors, whether they be from the same wiki or not. I'm surprised you haven't been reported for this, so do *me* a favor and start acting nicer to the people around you and learn to realize when you are in the wrong.

"Why would Smashpedia write its own material? SmashWiki and Smashpedia both have the same subject!" The subject is the same, the content is individually owned, as I explained.

"You're out of your mind if you think this "plagiarism" shenanigans would get me banned." Maybe it will, but it's more your attitude that will get you in hot water rather than the content you provide.

"Nothing will get me banned, for I am completely innocent." Nope.