Smashpedia:Requests for rollback

This page is for requesting that one is granted Rollback powers on SmashWiki.

Rules

 * Only self-nominations are allowed.
 * All new nominees should post their name below as a in a level 3 header ( ===Username=== ). Underneath, the user should state why he/she would like to be granted Rollback powers.
 * Users who wish to support, oppose, or comment on the nomination may do so underneath the person requesting Rollback powers.
 * After sufficient time has passed to allow all users who wish to express an opinion the chance to do so, a decision will be made based on community consensus as to whether or not the request will succeed. Once a decision has been made, the discussion will be archived and moved to an appropriate subpage.

Archives

 * KP317
 * Pikamander2
 * Miles.oppenheimer
 * Shadowcrest
 * JtM
 * GalaxiaD
 * Charitwo
 * Toon Ganondorf
 * Defiant Elements
 * Blue Ninjakoopa
 * Smorekingxg456
 * Cheezperson

Oxico
I am Oxico. I have been a vivid editor to this wiki since before the time it was in Wikia. Now, I could say how I created almost all the Final Smash pages and provided the damage percentages. I could also tell you how I beefed up almost all the movesets. I could also drone on and on about how I have made more than 1500 edits to the main wiki. But, being humble, I will not brag. Instead, I will provde a link to a list of all my contributions to the main namespace, because I know actions speak louder than words.

Votes/Comments

 * Why do you deserve rollback for just that? Rollback is for reverting vandalism, and while all that extra stuff is a plus, you really wouldn't need it for making over 1500 edits. KP317 (talk) 20:30, 10 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Support. You've been gone a lot lately, but when you are online, you are really helping the Wiki. This is not biased. JtM =^&#93; (talk) 21:01, 10 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Support. Oxico knows his stuff. {My name is Miles, and I approve this message.} 02:36, 15 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Support. You're active, and that's all that counts for this in my opinion.   Cheez person  { talk } stuff ''' 23:36, 15 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Support. You were put on hold for your request for sysop (seriously, when will they get back on track?), so you at least deserve a chance.  Mario Galaxy  { talk } 23:49, 15 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Support ^pikamander --Shadow crest 23:40, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

I move for this request to be closed with the result as "promotion" due to the fact that he's gotten nothing but support for the past 2 weeks.


 * Weak Oppose: You're clearly not a vandal, so I don't think you'd misuse Rollback privileges, but I have to go back to August of this year to find the last time you reverted an edit and of your last 500 edits only 2 were reverts, so I'm not sure I see why you need Rollback privileges. –  Defiant Elements  05:12, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong Support Per everyone above this defiant guy. Anyone notice how he opposes everything? http://i45.photobucket.com/albums/f76/Mariogamr/Sigs/189cca7d1.gif Koopa  Claus  http://i45.photobucket.com/albums/f76/Mariogamr/Sigs/189cca7d1.gif 20:28, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I've noticed that he opposed all the RfRs up, but I failed to realize how that mattered. Because it doesn't. --Shadow crest  20:34, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Of course you agree with him. You'll try and ruin everything you can. Why? It simply makes you feel good. A common slice of evidence that you're an evil person in general. =| http://i45.photobucket.com/albums/f76/Mariogamr/Sigs/189cca7d1.gif Koopa  Claus  http://i45.photobucket.com/albums/f76/Mariogamr/Sigs/189cca7d1.gif 20:49, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
 * If you can't recognize that was a NPA violation then you have a serious problem.
 * If you would actually read what I wrote, then you would notice that- unlike DE- I supported Oxico. I merely posted to make it quite plain that saying "Anyone notice how he opposes everything?" is not a valid way to refute his (or any) argument, and it never will be. --Shadow crest 21:58, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
 * LOL WUT  Koopa [[Image:Koopersshell.gif|19px]]  Klaus  22:06, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

I Move For Close In Support. KP317 (talk) 19:36, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

Oppose. Defiant Elements. UP / T  01:23, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Gutripper
Yes I know I was a poor contributor at the start, but I really have changed. During my time as administrator of the Smash Arena, I learned a lot about how to get along with other users and about responsibilty. I have always tried to make good edits, and I do revert vandalism as much as I can. Rollback powers would not be wasted on me.

Thankyou -- Gutripper Speak if you are worthy  00:25, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

Votes/Comments
Support - I honestly don't see why not. He's active and makes decent contributions.  Blue Ninjakoopa  Happy Holidays 00:33, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

You go girl! - My infamous remark plays back. 'Tripper deserves Rollback powers. -- Pikabro PIKA  CHU!  00:34, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Care to say why? Smore King  Hap py Holidays!  13:10, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Because he's active, mature, helpful and reverts vandalism when he finds it. Reverting isn't something you can just do, like editing. There has to be stuff to revert. Besides Smore, we know that you oppose Gutripper. You don't have to keep commenting on other people's support.  Pikabro PIKA  CHU!  23:16, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Even if I supported him, I would have given a reason and asked about yours. Smore King  Hap py Holidays!  23:28, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

Support - My friend, you have come a long way from the ignorant moron who told Fyre she was full of herself. Now you are making decent edits, reverting vandalism (which is the whole idea), are active despite huge commitments, and a mature contributor. I'm proud of your progress and I hope that you get this privelege. You deserve it. -- Toon Ganondorf    (t    c)  00:39, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Why does he deserve it? Your reason doesn't really have anything to do with rollback.SZL (talk) 23:37, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I think that he will make a good rollbackr because he makes decent edits, is active, reverts vandalism and is mature. I said that. If you disagree, oppose him. -- Toon Ganondorf    (t    c)  23:40, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Having fun changing your reason to make him seem stupid? Smoreking   2009 is coming!   22:33, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

Support. "You're active, and you're not a vandal. IMO, those are the only things that matter." --Posted by Pikamander2   (Talk)  at 01:27, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

Support Pikamander2^ Mas  ter  man   Happy  Holidays!  !  01:29, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

Support He'll do good things with rollback.  Cheez person  { talk } stuff ''' 01:50, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Like...?[[Image:SZL.png|45px]] UP / T  01:27, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Revert vandalism. His edits are good in heart, and he will fight vandalism here when he gets the chance.   Cheez person  { talk } stuff ''' 09:08, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Support. Reliable and trustworthy, but also Pikamander's (in)famous line. Miles ( talk)  02:56, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

Support Decent guy. I haven't been here long, but from what I can tell, he is a great asset for fighting vandalism. Why shouldn't he get it''' -- The Steel Avenger  Taste my cold steel!

s'port ^^^  Ike's Best Buddy Merry! Christmas!! 
 * Yeah, you kind of need to put a reason. If "^^^" means the vote above yours, he didn't really put a reason either.[[Image:SZL.png|45px]] UP / T  01:22, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Well, I actually did. If you had taken the time to read rather than rushing to get as much reasons to ruin this guy's chances. I have noticed that his has been the only one that you've dissected to question every vot they get.  The Steel Avenger  Taste my cold steel! 
 * Having fun changing your reason to make him seem stupid? You just added for fighting vandalism. You guys are just making SZL seem like an arrogant cock, and trust me, he isn't. Smoreking   2009 is coming!   22:33, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

Support As TG said, the old days of Gutripper going up and PAing Fyre are gone, and I believe that Gutripper has matured enough to turn a new page in his Smashwiki profile. He can only help with rollback, and will be very helpful to Smashwiki with rollback.  Fried beef  1    Ho ho ho!   21:13, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

Oppose. I hate to be this guy, but you haven't really reverted much, so why would you need Rollback? Smore King  Hap py Holidays!  23:43, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
 * He's active, dude. Isn't that what matters? Anyone can revert, it's the activity that counts.  Blue Ninjakoopa <font face="Elephant"> Happy Holidays 23:49, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Actually, I reverted vandalism on Clarinet Hawk's page from the stupid loser called Shit Ass Fuckers. Also, I was checking for his other vandalism, but it had already been taken care of. -- Gutripper Speak if you are worthy  23:52, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I still think SK shouldn't be so harsh with this oppose. You're also mature, something key to having rollback powers. <font face="Elephant"> Blue Ninjakoopa <font face="Elephant"> Happy Holidays 00:04, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Notice how I said this guy? That's because somebody(an admin, DE, Shadowcrest, etc.) is going to come by and notice that too, so I just wanted to say it. As with the message I've posted on Gutripper's talk page, he hasn't reverted much, and somebody's going to notice it. And if you think I'm being a dick right now, I'm sorry. Smore King  Hap py Holidays!  00:12, 20 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Oppose. Smoreking. Also, if there's not enough vandalism to revert in order for you to run, then wait until there is enough, and then run.[[Image:SZL.png|45px]] UP / T  23:47, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm just gonna say this as a third-party, and not as a pal/good friend/really cool guy that knows Gutripper. If you wait for enough vandalism (and we get plenty), why should he wait till the last minute to run if some vandal like Willy on Wheels come and mess everything up?  There's plenty of vandalism on SW, and we should have more vandal fighters.  Fried  beef  1    Ho ho ho!   01:33, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Allow me to rephrase. If there's not enough vandalism for you to revert, then wait until you have reverted enough, then run. OK?[[Image:SZL.png|45px]] UP / T  21:14, 23 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Neutral. Pikamander & Smoreking. B AL τʀο  [  talk  ] 23:50, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

ParaGoomba348
Okay, here I go again. I have the skill. I am an admin or close to an admin on some wiki's. I've returned.

Votes/Comments

 * Oppose. no real reasons yet, and often throws fits that occasionally include vandalism. Xtrme   Enter   2009  01:54, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Slight Support Moody, but active. I'm wondering what happened to your other proposal...  Blue  Ninjakoopa  01:57, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Support. "You're active, and you're not a vandal. IMO, those are the only things that matter." Just so you know, there is no apostrophe in wikis. --Posted by Pikamander2   (Talk)  at 01:58, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Slight oppose What DE said last time. Smoreking   2009 is coming!   02:35, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak Oppose. Essentially what I said last time.  A second look at at your contributions revealed that among your last 500 contributions you've only got a single single revert (not including two self-reverts).  There's simply no evidence that you have any need of rollback, nor that you would put it to any use.  –  Defiant Elements   +talk  04:40, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Support He's active, not a vandal, and enthusiastic.  He does get moody, but giving him rollback is safe.  We need more vandal fighters.   Cheez person  { talk } stuff ''' 05:37, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
 * SupportHe's a good guy, and what's more, he's a vandal target. ROllback will really help him, and he would do well with it, I'm sure.  Toon Ganondorf    (t    c) 
 * I'm glad TG brought that up. A number of the vandals we get here take the names of "IHAETPARAGOOMBA348" or something like that.   Cheez person  { talk } stuff ''' 05:45, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
 * You'll have to excuse me if I don't see how that's relevant. The fact is that, despite those vandals, he hasn't been reverting vandalism, so why should it have any bearing on his RfR?  –  Defiant Elements   +talk  05:48, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I agree with DE (O.o). Cheezperson, we aren't building an army. Basically, you said that anyone can request rollback so long as they're active, which is not the case (though I've said otherwise before).  Blue  Ninjakoopa  06:03, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
 * SmashWiki talk:Requests for rollback. SZL's got a point. Smoreking   2009 is coming!   13:46, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
 * BNK is against me because he dislikes me. If someone could give me 3 examples of this user starting an edit war in the past month, I will change my vote.   Cheez person  { talk } stuff ''' 19:54, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
 * lol I LOVE you, I just like messing with your head. I'm not saying you shouldn't support him, I'm just saying you should find another reason than "We need more vandal fighters". What is this, Star Wars?  Blue  Ninjakoopa  20:01, 30 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Slight Support Very active, but more reverts would boost this bid for rollback.  Fried beef  1    Ho ho ho!   20:58, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Support. Pikamander2. Masterman   20  09  19:32, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Fried beef1
From the pressuring of many of my friends on this wiki, I am running for rollback now. This would be a benefit, due to the fact that I am very active, made many vandal reverts to my name, and that I have not made any major disputes that will spark edit wars. This would be the farthest I shall attempt to achieve due to the fact that I see no point in me getting admin rights. Check this out if you still have doubts. Cheers!

Votes/Comments

 * Strong Support It's about time, Beef! Honestly, he's an outstanding contributor, a great friend, and is very active. Not to mention how kind he is. Go for it!  Blue  Ninjakoopa  03:57, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Support. That he's a "great friend" and "really kind" is really neither here nor there. That said, he is active, and a brief glance at his contributions reveals that he's got more than a handful of reverts, which is good enough for me.  –  Defiant Elements   +talk  04:32, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
 * That was just plain unnecessary, dude. Not everything needs to benefit you. Think about other people for once.  Blue  Ninjakoopa  04:41, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Huh? I'm confused.  The only time I mentioned myself in my vote is when I said that the candidate meets my standards, which is essentially synonymous with my vote of "support."  If you're referring to my debunking of your vote, I disagree. While it wasn't strictly necessary in the sense that it wasn't related to the reasoning behind my own vote, far too many of the votes on requests for rollback (and on requests for adminship, for that matter) feature the same kind of specious reasoning, and I think it's more than appropriate (necessary, even) to address that fact.  That said, your vote also featured some legitimate reasoning, but my point stands.  –  Defiant Elements   +talk  04:51, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
 * By "suspicious resoning" you mean votes such as Pikabro's "You Go Girl" or other invalid reasons?  Blue  Ninjakoopa  04:55, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
 * The word is "specious" (yes, I'm pedantic, get over it), which is to say, yes, since specious reasons, by definition, are false (i.e. invalid) reasons. –  Defiant Elements   +talk  04:58, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
 * SmashWiki talk:Requests for rollback. Yeah. Smoreking   2009 is coming!   13:48, 30 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The word is Support. He's an excellent contributor, and I've seen some decent vandal fighting. Good for you.  Toon Ganondorf    (t    c)  05:13, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong Support I knew you'd take my advice eventually. Active, good at heart, what else is there to say?   Cheez person  { talk } stuff ''' 05:34, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
 * About time. Support.  The Steel Avenger  Taste my cold steel! 
 * Reasons would help... Smoreking   2009 is coming!   14:50, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Everything I could say has been said.  The Steel Avenger  Taste my cold steel! 


 * SUPPORT! You have a bunch of reverts. Finally you ran! Smoreking   2009 is coming!   13:45, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
 * You go, guy! You would make for an awesome rollback. <font color="Purple">Para <font color="Blue">Goomba <font color="Green">348 19:47, 30 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Um, why? Smoreking   2009 is coming!   20:19, 31 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Support. Anyone who's been paying attention should see that Friedbeef would be another valued addition to our anti-vandal team. Miles ( talk)   17:55, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Support. Everyone above me. Masterman   20  09  20:04, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

MarioGalaxy
Hello everyone. As the heading implies, I am MarioGalaxy. I wish to obtain rollback powers because of constant vandalism to the Wiki. I've reverted several edits in the past months, at first because I could not go to school (injury), and because of my constant activity for the remainder of the year. It's difficult to me for find the right words to say why I should have Rollback, but from what I've seen, you need to be active, not be a vandal, and have reverted multiple edits in the recent past. I'd say I've followed all of those. I also feel that it's been difficult for me to revert edits recently because of the several users that have been given rollback powers. Several of them have said that I should run for rollback, so I figured, "Why not give it a shot?" Please, if you wish to support or oppose my Request for Rollback, leave a vote or comment below. Thank you.  Mario Galaxy  May Guthix be with you...

Votes/Comments

 * Support He's active and has a decent number of reverts. I think he deserves it.  Blue  Ninjakoopa  19:03, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Support. BNK.^ Masterman   20  09  19:34, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Support You're extremely active, you have a lot of reverts(and a lot more attempted reverts), and rollback would help you. Smoreking   2009 is coming!   19:37, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Extremely Strong Support. MarioGalaxy is a trustworthy, reliable editor throughout the site and regularly reverts vandalism.  There is no reason to not award this tool.  Miles ( talk)   19:46, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Support I thought that you already had it. Don't know why, but...   Cheez person  { talk } stuff ''' 21:31, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Support A seasoned, reliable user who has plenty of reverts and fits the criteria perfectly. Good for you, MG.  Toon Ganondorf    (t    c) 
 * ur overdue to run, dude. or, in other words, Support. Xtrme   Enter   2009  23:37, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Support Yeah, I agree with everyone, especially the part where your run is overdue. Good on you.  The Steel Avenger  Taste my cold steel! 
 * Support Miles's reason :D  Fried beef  1    Ho ho ho!   00:15, 2 January 2009 (UTC)