Smashpedia:Requests for rollback/Blue Ninjakoopa (2)

''Result: The community wants to give you another chance. Don't blow it. Clarinet Hawk (talk · contributions) 01:51, 3 February 2009 (UTC)''

Blue Ninjakoopa
Hi. I'm requesting rollback again because I lost it (intimidating behavior). I've returned to get it back, with the promise that I won't ever abuse it again. I know temper has nothing to do with rollback, so please don't bring that up. I want honest votes from all of you.  Blue Ninjakoopa Talk 07:00, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Votes/Comments

 * Comment. Exactly why do you think that it is a good idea to request rollback the same day your ban ended and within a week of losing it for abusing it?  Clarinet Hawk (talk · contributions) 07:20, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
 * According to Shadowcrest, temper isn't a problem here; it's how active I am and how many reverts I have.  Blue Ninjakoopa Talk 07:38, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
 * That's a fair answer to my question. Enough that I'll stay neutral here and let the community be the judge.  Clarinet Hawk (talk · contributions) 03:26, 2 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Oppose BNK is a rude user that loses his temper over nothing on a constant basis and has had these powers removed once before, and I have no doubt that it would happen again. He has promised several times before to not do it again, but I have stopped believing him. When he admits that his temper is his fault, not anyone elses, then I will change my vote.  Toon Ganondorf    (t    c) 
 * How about you find a real reason, Toon Ganondorf. I've never been rude to you at all. lol, I only promised once (this request), stop making up stuff just to try and make sure I don't get this ability.  Blue Ninjakoopa Talk 07:38, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
 * lol, you dumpkoff. I know my temper is my fault, it's simply helped. Change nao.  Blue Ninjakoopa Talk 12:54, 1 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Temper didn't help KP, if you recall. Despite the fact that you have suddenly hated me for no reason, I still think that you deserve Rollback. TG will be cross that I chose you over him, but Support.  Gutripper Speak 
 * I thought KP lost adminship because of his temper?  Blue Ninjakoopa Talk 07:47, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
 * He failed rollback three times because of temper too.  Gutripper Speak 
 * Actually, it was because he didn't adhere to policy. Smoreking (T)  (c)  13:32, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Cut it out with this friendship bs. "TG will be cross that I chose you over him"? Learn to wiki. When you get involved in a conversation, throw your friendships out the window as long as the topic is being discussed. You [Gutripper] shouldn't change your ideas because your friends disagree, and your friends shouldn't take a disagreement personally. Friendships have no place as far as wiki is concerned- please prevent them from influencing yours or anyone's opinion. -- Shadow  crest  18:15, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Actually, it didn't. I went against him. That's my point. It didn't influence me.  Gutripper Speak 
 * The fact that it was even mentioned shows that the problem still exists. I did not mean to single you or anyone out, just make everyone aware of the problem so they can correct it. --  Shadow  crest  20:51, 1 February 2009 (UTC)


 * He needs to control his temper. The rest I don't even have to say... ' ~Teh Blue ' Blur~ A revolution begins. 15:27, 2 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Mild Support You have a decent amount of reverts, as I said last time. Although you can be temperamental, you are still a good contributor, and I can't really see rollback being used in an edit war anyway that simple undoing can't be. Smoreking (T)  (c)  13:45, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Temper doesn't matter though :(  Blue Ninjakoopa Talk 13:46, 1 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Support. This again? no reason to take it away when the person gets banned for intimidation. Xtrme   Cupid Will  Get You....  17:12, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak Support. I mean yeah, no doubt you'll do a good job, but I'm worried your temper will get the best of you again. Shade  487  z  19:23, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Neutral. You've got a decent number of reverts, but, frankly, I'm not willing to simply take you on your word that you won't abuse it again, especially seeing as how you just came off of a ban. If, over time, you prove that you're serious about being more srs, I'll reconsider my vote. On a side note, while temper (and, more generally, behavior), in of itself, isn't an issue, it is a legitimate concern in so far as it correlates to potential abuse. – Defiant Elements   +talk  19:28, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
 * So that's how temper is involved? >_>  Blue Ninjakoopa Talk 19:37, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
 * In theory, yes. –  Defiant Elements   +talk  19:49, 1 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Slight Support. Learn to keep your cool.  Other than that, same reasons he was supported above and last time.  Miles ( talk)   20:02, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Support: I'm sorta related to your ban...I did kinda troll you...I don't expect forgiveness, but I'll try to fix my mistakes. Besides, you fixed my page about a million times.Silvie (talk) 21:07, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong Support The fact remains that he can be the biggest ass in the world. As long as he keeps it off the Wiki, his temper has no influence. Kperfekt722  These Rules Are Stupid 21:33, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
 * XD For that, I award you ten bakies.  Blue Ninjakoopa Talk 00:58, 2 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Support He is a good user that I think has made a lot of reverts. He has also made many edits, and he is someone I could trust. - Luca3 (talk) 23:24, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Neutral leaning to oppose Well if u hav got it 3 times already we know that you will prove to be a good user and use i well but the fact that you repeatedly lost it for the same reson obviously means that you have not yet learned your lesson and we are left with the question of if you deserve it again  Pikabro PIKA  CHU!  05:53, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Actually, he's got it once, and lost it once. Be reasonable.  Gutripper Speak 


 * Support Same for his previous Rfr.  Fried beef  1    Love   23:21, 2 February 2009 (UTC)