Smashpedia:Requests for rollback

This page is for requesting that one is granted Rollback powers on SmashWiki.

Rules

 * Only self-nominations are allowed.
 * All new nominees should post their name below as a in a level 3 header ( ===Username=== ). Underneath, the user should state why he/she would like to be granted Rollback powers.
 * Users who wish to support, oppose, or comment on the nomination may do so underneath the person requesting Rollback powers.
 * After sufficient time has passed to allow all users who wish to express an opinion the chance to do so, a decision will be made based on community consensus as to whether or not the request will succeed. Once a decision has been made, the discussion will be archived and moved to an appropriate subpage.

Archives

 * KP317
 * Pikamander2
 * Miles.oppenheimer
 * Shadowcrest
 * JtM
 * GalaxiaD
 * Charitwo

Oxico
I am Oxico. I have been a vivid editor to this wiki since before the time it was in Wikia. Now, I could say how I created almost all the Final Smash pages and provided the damage percentages. I could also tell you how I beefed up almost all the movesets. I could also drone on and on about how I have made more than 1500 edits to the main wiki. But, being humble, I will not brag. Instead, I will provde a link to a list of all my contributions to the main namespace, because I know actions speak louder than words.

Votes/Comments

 * Why do you deserve rollback for just that? Rollback is for reverting vandalism, and while all that extra stuff is a plus, you really wouldn't need it for making over 1500 edits. KP317 (talk) 20:30, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Support. You've been gone a lot lately, but when you are online, you are really helping the Wiki. This is not biased. JtM =^&#93; (talk) 21:01, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Support. Oxico knows his stuff. {My name is Miles, and I approve this message.} 02:36, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

Support. You're active, and that's all that counts for this in my opinion.  Cheez person  { talk } stuff ''' 23:36, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

Support. You were put on hold for your request for sysop (seriously, when will they get back on track?), so you at least deserve a chance.  Mario Galaxy  { talk } 23:49, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

I move for this request to be closed with the result as "promotion" due to the fact that he's gotten nothing but support for the past 2 weeks.

Para Goomba 348
I am running for rollback. I have made a lot of edits, and I've been reverting vandal's edits like a rollback should do. Plus, I have been here for quite a while now, and I'm an active user. I do not vandalize pages, and I have never vandalized. I deserve to be a rollback. I have improved my grammar and spelling, so I basically will not spell things wrong. I do not use slang OR contractions very much. I would help the wiki in all that is needed. It will be best for me and you. Para Goomba 348 (C'mon, just eat turkey ) 02:37, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

Votes/Comments

 * Support. Paragoomba's trust-worthy as an anti-vandal. Miles (talk - contribs) 03:09, 18 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Strong support. "You're active, and you're not a vandal. IMO, those are the only things that matter." --Posted by Pikamander2   (Talk)  at 03:36, 18 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Support You Deserve It. KP317 (talk) 22:25, 19 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Support Ehh... Its rollback, what badness could you do? JtM =^&#93; (talk) 03:06, 20 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Support. Yeah, I think you get the picture.   Cheez person  { talk } stuff ''' 07:29, 21 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Support Same as Pikamander2. Masterman   Eat   Turkey!  03:31, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

Toon Ganondorf
Hi. I decided to run for rollback after my run for adminship was shot down. I've been here a while, and I've significantly improved many articles, wrote four, and reverted much vandalism. I write in a clear, precise and accurate way, and I put what is necessary in. I will always put the best interests of the wiki community ahead of myself.

For these reasons, I believe that I deserve rollback.

Thankyou  Toon Ganondorf CHAT  02:21, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

Votes/Comments

 * Mild support. Nothing really noteworthy, but I'm gonna go with Pikamander's default answer on this one: You're not a vandal, you're active and that's what matters. Miles (talk - contribs) 02:26, 22 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Support. See above vote.   Cheez person  { talk } stuff ''' 02:27, 22 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Support. "You're active, and you're not a vandal. IMO, those are the only things that matter." --Posted by  Pikamander2   (Talk)  at 02:38, 22 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Support Pikamander, Cheez, and Miles make it so easy to explain... Fried  beef  1    Argue   03:44, 22 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Support Go Toon! You deserve it. -- Gutripper Speak if you are worthy  03:42, 22 November 2008 (UTC)


 * You go girl! No, I'm actually serious. Go for it! -- Pikabro PIKA  CHU!  06:22, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

Smorekingxg456
Whoo. O.K. Here I go.

I am running for rollback because I am on Smashwiki as much as I can(which is nearly the entire weekend, and sometimes Mon-Fri), I consider myself trustworthy, and I haven't vandalized and I am against vandalism(remember LarioGalaxy or MarioGlaxay? I reverted many of their edits). I feel that not much more should be said, as it is just rollback, which can only be used against vandals, and with this message, I hope you support my RfR. Thank you.  Smoreking  xg456  19:37, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

Votes/Comments
Strong Support. "You're active, and you're not a vandal. IMO, those are the only things that matter." --Posted by Pikamander2   (Talk)  at 19:40, 22 November 2008 (UTC)