Smashpedia:Requests for adminship/Zmario

Zmario
I believe I should be a sysop for the following reasons:


 * Contributes Everyday
 * Fills in Universe & Character Info
 * Uploaded Many Pictures
 * Made Almost all of the Event Matches
 * I am a very helpful person
 * I discuss my ideas
 * I do not use profanity much (not even at all)
 * Updates Music, Sticker, and Trophies info

If you ask, I'd say I'd be a good canidate for a sysop. Ask around. I'm sure people will vouch for me. KazMx knows that I update alot, ask him! Thanks for your time and consideration for reading this. Even if i don't get sysop status I will still do my part to help smash fans everywhere :).


 * I strongly oppose giving this user any administrative powers. Not to be a bitch, but this user's contributions are a regular nuisance and I often have to go back and clean up after them. Many pages created by this user end up getting deleted. I mean, it's not all bad contributions, but there's too many iffy ones to let me think that it's a good idea to make this user an admin/sysop. FyreNWater - (Talk • Contributions ) 21:34, 1 April 2008 (UTC)


 * I'll go with neutral, leaning oppose: I'm not sure the candidate wants the tools for the right reasons... --Sky (t · c · w) 06:16, 3 April 2008 (UTC)


 * I'm going to have to oppose, doesn't seem like the right time or reason. --Charitwo 04:09, 5 April 2008 (UTC)


 * I'm very opposed to this person becoming a sysop. Most of his pages are complete jokes or just one step past that.  And his comments on the tier forum about deleting the page on the wiki about tiers make me worry that he will just go around deleting any legitimate page he disagrees with while protecting his jokes and pet projects. Clarinet Hawk 03:39, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Not long after posting my previous comment, I can across even more damming evidence against this person. I recently had to mark a page he made for deletion because he openly said on the talk page that he made the whole thing up because it "sounded right."  This isn't acceptable action by a normal user, let alone a sysop.  I'm still opposed and I haven't seen any other users of the wiki who support this person becoming a sysop.  I believe that it is time to close this discussion.  Clarinet Hawk 18:01, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

One word Opposed Kperfekt722 21:51, 22 April 2008 (UTC)