Forum:Why is wario top tier

okay, so a while back i made uneducated, sweeping judgments about the tier list about how most of the placements were bullcrap. guess who's vindicated? guess who's not capitalizing any of his letters as a sign of victory? me. it's me playas.

basically all i really had to say was that donkey kong was too high (i was right, he's now much farther down) r.o.b was too high (i was right, he moved way down + he's a joke/tool) and that wario was way too high. that last bit is still a bit of a problem. so i'm asking you guys, who probably now finally have surpassed me in smash bros knowledge as i have not played the game with the exception of playing as a flower and playing brawl+ in about a year. why is wario top tier? he has 2 killing moves, as i count them, wario waft, which he has to charge, and his forward smash, which gets nerfed by the retarded stale moves codes. he has decent but not exceptional priority, and he's quite easily avoided. he has middle-of-the-road lag, and he does put on a whole bunch of damage. i also think he's fairly easily exploited. the only thing that's really s-class is his recovery. could it be that people have just not figured out how to beat wario yet? could it be that hard to figure out a character who basically fights with his ass? i know one thing. i can't be wrong here. so why do you think it's taken the back room so long to catch up with my foresight? Semicolon (talk) 00:59, December 11, 2009 (UTC)