Thread:MayhemKing/@comment-16072884-20131024024037/@comment-16072884-20131214141624

''You wanna know? Alright.

Controller inputs.

Controller inputs. Controller inputs. Controller inputs.

I can't even find controller inputs for Brawl or Melee, so I'm either looking in the wrong place or it doesn't exist.

But yes; You keep going on about controller inputs. That's the 1 and only argument you have about us not adding more factual information to this site's pages. You told me about good faith once, for people making the changes on this Wiki, but you just say controller inputs before deleting the edit right off the bat.'' It doesn't matter if it's the only "not weak" argument I have if you can't refute it. You can find the inputs for Brawl and Melee by playing the game and pressing the buttons and control sticks.

Removing edits that have been determined to not be allowed is not assuming bad faith in any way.

''Your other arguments are weak at best, besides this one. What Arceus-forsaken editor on Sakurai's team will put Mario's Fireball as an Up Special Move?'' Explain why they're weak if you're going to go around calling them weak. And there is absolutely nothing stopping them from making Fireball Mario's up special move. Don't go around repeating the same arguments that I already refuted, or explain why I'm wrong.

Common sense makes editing easier for us, not making it harder or less authentic. You still haven't explained why we should be able to use common sense here if I already told you that common sense won't work here and you haven't refuted it.

Just stop reversing the edits people make that contain actual thought out information instead of yelling "controller inputs" and running off into the night. Alternatively, try talking about the edits FIRST on the Talk Page like you tell me to do. I'll let you know that you are the one who's adding them back in without discussing on the talk page first like I tell you to do. And if you guys can't refute my "controller inputs" arguments, then you shouldn't be adding them in without explaining why first on the talk page.

I'll also let you know that the stuff you accused me of doing, removing your erroneous edits that are repeatedly added back despite my warnings not to, and you getting mad because I can only provide one "non-weak" argument, are not being rude in any way, and they're the way this wiki works.