Talk:Smashtasm

bias
obviously biased, but can somebody figure out the facts and fix up the article? FyreNWater - (Talk • Contributions ) 06:45, December 4, 2007 (EST)
 * I'd love to fix this up like I did The Wrath of Giga Bowser...but this is just too horribly written. Even I can't do anything. Darkurai 16:12, December 4, 2007 (EST)

Cafinator cannot see why we need this. Can someone tell me, please? Cafinator (talk) 22:49, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Because the series is wildly popular on youtube, and I guess that's enough to get it an article. Shade (talk) 22:52, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

Well, it doesn't have an effect on the game itself, and I don't think is has a large impact on the Smash Brothers communities. But, I'm not one who decides this stuff. Cafinator (talk) 22:54, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

You do decide this stuff, well you do decide if no one else puts their own opinion in - Hatake91 (talk) 23:04, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

JtM and Zmario already deleted the article for the spin-off of this series, so we might as well keep this one. Plus, The Wrath of Giga Bowser doesn't have an effect on the game as well, and we still have the article. MarioGalaxy (talk) 23:05, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Right. If we deleted this, we'd might as well delete all articles on fan vids. Shade (talk) 23:09, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

Well, that's kind'a what I'm saying.

Uhh...don't hurt me for saying that. Cafinator (talk) 23:11, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

Well, there's still the issue of the images. If someone deletes the article, than we'll have no use for the images, meaning whoever got them wasted their time for nothing. MarioGalaxy (talk) 23:21, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Actually, I'm going to put the picture of Fox and Falco on the DUMMY stage in the DUMMY Article. That's another use for it. MarioGalaxy (talk) 23:23, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
 * If there is anyone who would like to voice their opinion, speak now or forever hold your peace. No, this isn't a wedding. MarioGalaxy (talk) 23:31, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

Keep. I think that since the majority of people who watch these videos ARE a part of the smasher community, it affects them somehow. Besides, that's a lot of hard work gone to waste if we delete ALL of the fan vid articles, and we can't just delete this one, so yeah. Shade (talk) 23:39, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

Keep. I've seen the series. I've got nothing better to do at the moment, so I might as well vote keep. MarioGalaxy (talk) 23:41, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

Cafinator. I'll just stick with a neutral party on this one. Cafinator (talk) 23:42, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

Delete if we had to keep articles on some Super Smash Bros videos we would have to create an article FOR THEM ALL and Silverdragon doesnt want us doing that. Besides who cares about this anyway. Zmario (talk) 23:44, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

Delete with a bit of Cafinator. it doesnt have anything to do with the development of smash, if someone wanted to make a page about it, make a forum like thing JtM =^&#93; (talk) 23:53, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

Is there anyone else who wants to vote? In a way, we have a partial 3-way tie. MarioGalaxy (talk) 23:55, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

I'm good with the Forum idea. Cafinator (talk) 23:57, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

Well, Cafinator, you already voted. So it's still a 3-way tie. Anyone else wanting to vote, here are the choices:
 * Keep: Article Stays
 * Delete: Article is Deleted, Images need Another Use, etc.
 * Cafinator (self-proclaimed vote for Neutral): We move the article to a forum.

Place your votes above or below, your choice. MarioGalaxy (talk) 00:08, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

KEEP Pikazilla (talk) 00:09, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

Oh, and your vote has to be bolded. MarioGalaxy (talk) 00:15, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

So my ballet is already in the box, huh?

Well, guess I'll just watch from here. Cafinator (talk) 00:16, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

I don't think it matters if it's bolded or not, MG. Not only that, but how long will this little poll continue? Shade (talk) 00:18, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

Ok, it doesn't matter if it's bolded or not. I think it's pretty much over. Keep had the most votes, so, keep the article, I guess. MarioGalaxy (talk) 00:20, 18 August 2008 (UTC)