Thread:TheUltraman/@comment-24199555-20131207201243/@comment-16072884-20131208031112

"counterproductive" It's necessary for me to be "counterproductive" if what you're adding that you believe is "productive" does not actually improve the content of the wiki or fits its guidelines.

"He's upsetting members who put time and effort into this Wiki." What are you guys upset about? How am I making you upset? If you guys are upset because I think that your edits are not good, don't get all upset if what you want for the wiki just doesn't work in that person's opinion. If someone disagrees with you, that is no means to get all angry at them and ask them to be blocked. If you guys think I'm rude or annoying or something like that, please show me, and don't confuse someone "telling you why your viewpoint is wrong" with being "annoying" or "rude". If you're annoyed or upset that someone's refuting your arguments, what you can do is argue why they're wrong instead of complaining that the person is annoying or upsetting you.

"We will spend hours updating information (confirmed moves) and he will, in one fell swoop, remove everything we worked on with little to no warning " I give you guys warnings in the edit summary. Why do you keep on adding the stuff back in after I remove them when you're supposed to be discussing the issue on the talk page?

"when trying to discuss it with him he's irrational" If you think I'm being irrational, please show me, and being irrational in an argument isn't a problem that deserves blocking.

"He appears to have control issues" Show me where you think I have issues controlling myself and I'll address those if I have to.