Smashpedia:Requests for rollback

This page is for requesting that one is granted Rollback powers on SmashWiki.

Rules

 * Only self-nominations are allowed.
 * All new nominees should post their name below as a in a level 3 header ( ===Username=== ). Underneath, the user should state why he/she would like to be granted Rollback powers.
 * Users who wish to support, oppose, or comment on the nomination may do so underneath the person requesting Rollback powers.
 * After sufficient time has passed to allow all users who wish to express an opinion the chance to do so, a decision will be made based on community consensus as to whether or not the request will succeed. Once a decision has been made, the discussion will be archived and moved to an appropriate subpage.

Archives

 * KP317
 * Pikamander2
 * Miles.oppenheimer
 * Shadowcrest
 * JtM
 * GalaxiaD
 * Charitwo
 * Toon Ganondorf
 * Defiant Elements
 * Blue Ninjakoopa
 * Smorekingxg456
 * Cheezperson

Oxico
I am Oxico. I have been a vivid editor to this wiki since before the time it was in Wikia. Now, I could say how I created almost all the Final Smash pages and provided the damage percentages. I could also tell you how I beefed up almost all the movesets. I could also drone on and on about how I have made more than 1500 edits to the main wiki. But, being humble, I will not brag. Instead, I will provde a link to a list of all my contributions to the main namespace, because I know actions speak louder than words.

Votes/Comments

 * Why do you deserve rollback for just that? Rollback is for reverting vandalism, and while all that extra stuff is a plus, you really wouldn't need it for making over 1500 edits. KP317 (talk) 20:30, 10 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Support. You've been gone a lot lately, but when you are online, you are really helping the Wiki. This is not biased. JtM =^&#93; (talk) 21:01, 10 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Support. Oxico knows his stuff. {My name is Miles, and I approve this message.} 02:36, 15 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Support. You're active, and that's all that counts for this in my opinion.   Cheez person  { talk } stuff ''' 23:36, 15 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Support. You were put on hold for your request for sysop (seriously, when will they get back on track?), so you at least deserve a chance.  Mario Galaxy  { talk } 23:49, 15 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Support ^pikamander --Shadow crest 23:40, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

I move for this request to be closed with the result as "promotion" due to the fact that he's gotten nothing but support for the past 2 weeks.


 * Weak Oppose: You're clearly not a vandal, so I don't think you'd misuse Rollback privileges, but I have to go back to August of this year to find the last time you reverted an edit and of your last 500 edits only 2 were reverts, so I'm not sure I see why you need Rollback privileges. –  Defiant Elements  05:12, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong Support Per everyone above this defiant guy. Anyone notice how he opposes everything? http://i45.photobucket.com/albums/f76/Mariogamr/Sigs/189cca7d1.gif Koopa  Claus  http://i45.photobucket.com/albums/f76/Mariogamr/Sigs/189cca7d1.gif 20:28, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I've noticed that he opposed all the RfRs up, but I failed to realize how that mattered. Because it doesn't. --Shadow crest  20:34, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Of course you agree with him. You'll try and ruin everything you can. Why? It simply makes you feel good. A common slice of evidence that you're an evil person in general. =| http://i45.photobucket.com/albums/f76/Mariogamr/Sigs/189cca7d1.gif Koopa  Claus  http://i45.photobucket.com/albums/f76/Mariogamr/Sigs/189cca7d1.gif 20:49, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
 * If you can't recognize that was a NPA violation then you have a serious problem.
 * If you would actually read what I wrote, then you would notice that- unlike DE- I supported Oxico. I merely posted to make it quite plain that saying "Anyone notice how he opposes everything?" is not a valid way to refute his (or any) argument, and it never will be. --Shadow crest 21:58, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
 * LOL WUT  Koopa [[Image:Koopersshell.gif|19px]]  Klaus  22:06, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

I Move For Close In Support. KP317 (talk) 19:36, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

Oppose. Defiant Elements. UP / T  01:23, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Gutripper
Yes I know I was a poor contributor at the start, but I really have changed. During my time as administrator of the Smash Arena, I learned a lot about how to get along with other users and about responsibilty. I have always tried to make good edits, and I do revert vandalism as much as I can. Rollback powers would not be wasted on me.

Thankyou -- Gutripper Speak if you are worthy  00:25, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

Votes/Comments
Support - I honestly don't see why not. He's active and makes decent contributions.  Blue Ninjakoopa  Happy Holidays 00:33, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

You go girl! - My infamous remark plays back. 'Tripper deserves Rollback powers. -- Pikabro PIKA  CHU!  00:34, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Care to say why? Smore King  Hap py Holidays!  13:10, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Because he's active, mature, helpful and reverts vandalism when he finds it. Reverting isn't something you can just do, like editing. There has to be stuff to revert. Besides Smore, we know that you oppose Gutripper. You don't have to keep commenting on other people's support.  Pikabro PIKA  CHU!  23:16, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Even if I supported him, I would have given a reason and asked about yours. Smore King  Hap py Holidays!  23:28, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

Support - My friend, you have come a long way from the ignorant moron who told Fyre she was full of herself. I'm proud of your progress and I hope that you get this privelege. You deserve it. -- Toon Ganondorf    (t    c)  00:39, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Why does he deserve it? Your reason doesn't really have anything to do with rollback.SZL (talk) 23:37, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I think that he will make a good rollbackr because he makes decent edits, is active, reverts vandalism and is mature. If you disagree, oppose him. -- Toon Ganondorf    (t    c)  23:40, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

Support. "You're active, and you're not a vandal. IMO, those are the only things that matter." --Posted by Pikamander2   (Talk)  at 01:27, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

Support Pikamander2^ Mas  ter  man   Happy  Holidays!  !  01:29, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

Support He'll do good things with rollback.  Cheez person  { talk } stuff ''' 01:50, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Like...?[[Image:SZL.png|45px]] UP / T  01:27, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Revert vandalism. His edits are good in heart, and he will fight vandalism here when he gets the chance.   Cheez person  { talk } stuff ''' 09:08, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Support. Reliable and trustworthy, but also Pikamander's (in)famous line. Miles ( talk)  02:56, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

Support Decent guy. I haven't been here long, but from what I can tell, he is a great asset. Why shouldn't he get it''' -- The Steel Avenger  Taste my cold steel!

s'port ^^^  Ike's Best Buddy Merry! Christmas!! 
 * Yeah, you kind of need to put a reason. If "^^^" means the vote above yours, he didn't really put a reason either.[[Image:SZL.png|45px]] UP / T  01:22, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Support As TG said, the old days of Gutripper going up and PAing Fyre are gone, and I believe that Gutripper has matured enough to turn a new page in his Smashwiki profile. He can only help with rollback, and will be very helpful to Smashwiki with rollback.  Fried beef  1    Ho ho ho!   21:13, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

Oppose. I hate to be this guy, but you haven't really reverted much, so why would you need Rollback? Smore King  Hap py Holidays!  23:43, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
 * He's active, dude. Isn't that what matters? Anyone can revert, it's the activity that counts.  Blue Ninjakoopa <font face="Elephant"> Happy Holidays 23:49, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Actually, I reverted vandalism on Clarinet Hawk's page from the stupid loser called Shit Ass Fuckers. Also, I was checking for his other vandalism, but it had already been taken care of. -- Gutripper Speak if you are worthy  23:52, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I still think SK shouldn't be so harsh with this oppose. You're also mature, something key to having rollback powers. <font face="Elephant"> Blue Ninjakoopa <font face="Elephant"> Happy Holidays 00:04, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Notice how I said this guy? That's because somebody(an admin, DE, Shadowcrest, etc.) is going to come by and notice that too, so I just wanted to say it. As with the message I've posted on Gutripper's talk page, he hasn't reverted much, and somebody's going to notice it. And if you think I'm being a dick right now, I'm sorry. Smore King  Hap py Holidays!  00:12, 20 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Oppose. Smoreking. Also, if there's not enough vandalism to revert in order for you to run, then wait until there is enough, and then run.[[Image:SZL.png|45px]] UP / T  23:47, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm just gonna say this as a third-party, and not as a pal/good friend/really cool guy that knows Gutripper. If you wait for enough vandalism (and we get plenty), why should he wait till the last minute to run if some vandal like Willy on Wheels come and mess everything up?  There's plenty of vandalism on SW, and we should have more vandal fighters.  Fried  beef  1    Ho ho ho!   01:33, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Allow me to rephrase. If there's not enough vandalism for you to revert, then wait until you have reverted enough, then run. OK?[[Image:SZL.png|45px]] UP / T  21:14, 23 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Neutral. Pikamander & Smoreking. B AL τʀο  [  talk  ] 23:50, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

ParaGoomba348
Okay, here I go again. I have the skill. I am an admin or close to an admin on some wiki's. I've returned.

Votes/Comments

 * Oppose. no real reasons yet, and often throws fits that occasionally include vandalism. Xtrme   Enter   2009  01:54, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Slight Support Moody, but active. I'm wondering what happened to your other proposal...  Blue  Ninjakoopa  01:57, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Support. "You're active, and you're not a vandal. IMO, those are the only things that matter." Just so you know, there is no apostrophe in wikis. --Posted by Pikamander2   (Talk)  at 01:58, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Slight oppose What DE said last time. Smoreking   2009 is coming!   02:35, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak Oppose. Essentially what I said last time.  A second look at at your contributions revealed that among your last 500 contributions you've only got a single single revert (not including two self-reverts).  There's simply no evidence that you have any need of rollback, nor that you would put it to any use.  –  Defiant Elements   +talk  04:40, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

Fried beef1
From the pressuring of many of my friends on this wiki, I am running for rollback now. This would be a benefit, due to the fact that I am very active, made many vandal reverts to my name, and that I have not made any major disputes that will spark edit wars. This would be the farthest I shall attempt to achieve due to the fact that I see no point in me getting admin rights. Check this out if you still have doubts. Cheers!

Votes/Comments

 * Strong Support It's about time, Beef! Honestly, he's an outstanding contributor, a great friend, and is very active. Not to mention how kind he is. Go for it!  Blue  Ninjakoopa  03:57, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Support. That he's a "great friend" and "really kind" is really neither here nor there. That said, he is active, and a brief glance at his contributions reveals that he's got more than a handful of reverts, which is good enough for me.  –  Defiant Elements   +talk  04:32, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
 * That was just plain unnecessary, dude. Not everything needs to benefit you. Think about other people for once.  Blue  Ninjakoopa  04:41, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Huh? I'm confused.  The only time I mentioned myself in my vote is when I said that the candidate meets my standards, which is essentially synonymous with my vote of "support."  If you're referring to my debunking of your vote, I disagree. While it wasn't strictly necessary in the sense that it wasn't related to the reasoning behind my own vote, far too many of the votes on requests for rollback (and on requests for adminship, for that matter) feature the same kind of specious reasoning, and I think it's more than appropriate to address that fact.  –  Defiant Elements   +talk  04:51, 30 December 2008 (UTC)