Board Thread:Super Smash Bros. Discussion/@comment-26271346-20140928213935/@comment-24137779-20141002134317

MarioEternal wrote: DarKingdomHearts wrote: Haven't read all the comments, however I have one thing to say. Daisy is absolutely an useless character. Even if they were to choose another character from Mario it wouldn't be Daisy. It probably would be Toad (the blue one) and better ones I can think of are: Fawful, Paper Mario and NES Mario.

On the topic of DLC I think these are possible, as they are the most rumored ones: Ridley, Mewtwo, Ice Climbers, Impa, Isaac, Chorus Kids, Bandana Dee and Dixie Kong. Out of these 8 I would like Ridley, Mewtwo, Ice Climbers and Isaac the most.

Why would other Marios (like paper or NES) be better than Daisy? We already have regular Mario and Doctor Cutie. We don't need any more Marios.

Also, Fawful is a bad idea. You're probably only selecting him cause you think he's cool. Fawful is too minor, and only appeared in like 3 games, the second of which was just a cameo appearance. It doesn't matter if he was involved in RPGs with HUGE storylines and epic battles.

Even if Daisy was only is simple games and sports games, and not in big RPGs or games like that, she is a more prominent Mario character than Fawful. She has appeared in over 40+ games, even if they were just spinoffs. It doesn't matter if you think Fawful is cooler or more epic; he's just too minor compared to Daisy, who is a bit more recognized and featured more.

Also Blue Toad is a ridiculous idea because he's still Toad. And besides, he'd have color costumes anyway so that defeats the purpose of it specifically being the blue Toad character. Fawful is more likely then daisy cause he's more combat oriented.