User talk:Smorekingxg456

[ MAGIC ] [ EDIT BUTTON!!]

W00tage. Smoreking (T)  (c)  17:28, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

YESH! DAT'S 6 ARCHVS! IN UR FACE SOCIETY!

Ahem...Now that that's over.


 * I am only on Smashwiki on the weekends(mostly). I may or not be on during the week, although probably not.


 * No sections titled "mah boi". Just no.  Smoreking (T)  (c)  17:31, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

You archived to early.  Blue Ninjakoopa Talk 17:33, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
 * *Goes emo and sits in the corner cutting myself*  Smoreking (T)  (c)  17:34, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
 * No.  Blue Ninjakoopa Talk 17:53, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Ok... Smoreking (T)  (c)  17:55, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes.  Blue Ninjakoopa Talk 17:59, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

brawl
yea ill brawl, ill be on 4:30  Cree 318 PK TALKIN  19:14, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Eastern? Smoreking (T)  (c)  19:15, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
 * yea  Cree 318 PK TALKIN  19:19, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

Hey add me, I'll already added you (1805-5877-6092). --2koolalex (talk) 07:31, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

Hai! Do you wanna brawl me and my friend? (We're on wifi nau btw)  ~Teh Blue  Blur~ ... ~You're too slow!~ 13:25, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Sure. Smoreking (T)  (c)  13:27, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks smore! :)  ~Teh Blue  Blur~ ... ~You're too slow!~  13:28, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Lulz! http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/cd-i/images/9/93/SKSDW.PNG  ~Teh Blue  Blur~ ... ~You're too slow!~ 17:07, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

IRC? Masterman  20  09  18:33, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Ok. Smoreking (T)  (c)  18:34, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Okay
First of all, you should probably stop trying to annoy Shadowcrest by obsessing over him. :( He isn't an admin, yet. He's fully capable of defending himself in arguments and proving points (see my talk page archives). Also, how you treat mah othr boi is just plain unnecessary, as it violates both YAV and NPA. :( You're no better than he is for acting like a this, so get over your hatred (lol you hate him because you think there's a club for people that do) for him and apologize. RITE NAO.  Blue Ninjakoopa Talk 18:57, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Ok, now I'm mad. I know you didn't just get all over The Blue Blur about meeting new people to Brawl. You've violated that policy so many times, Smoreking. "HEY I STILL NVER BRAWLED YOU" is also unacceptable. I'm really disappointed in you. Honestly, what the hell is your problem?  Blue Ninjakoopa Talk 19:18, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

I'm probably about to piss you off even more right now, so you might not want to read this.


 * About the Shadowcrest thing, we are usually on the IRC and he always talks about he is superior and stuff(jokingly I assume) so I usually point it out here.
 * Paragoomba striked out a vote. I undid his edit, but did not realize I took out the comment when doing so. Also, how does that violate YAV and NPA? I haven't flamed him, I simply pointed out his signature was against policy, and I did not realize he had changed it, has he had not posted on a talk page with his new sig. Also, you have made fun of him too. Somewhere on my page or in my archives you have.


 * TBB. SW:NOT was not in effect when I had done it, and even before that, I created my header thing(User:Smorekingxg456/talk) to point out that I would not respond to brawl or random comments here. Now that NOT is in affect, I point it out using the template used to point out violation of policies, which TBB did, and I plan to find many other users violating SW:NOT.

That is my problem, and if you are going to hate me for the next few days/weeks/forever, I will learn to deal with it. Smoreking (T)  (c)  20:54, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Conversation:

I DID!!!!! ParaGoomba348/ACOFL 14:47, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

Look at mah Boi Smasherbeta. ParaGoomba348/ACOFL 15:59, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
 * And my question remains, what does ACOFL have to do with your name? Nobody calls you that. Smoreking (T)  (c)  16:01, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
 * ParaGoomba fails.  Blue Ninjakoopa Talk 16:50, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah. I almost have 600 edits to the main namespace!  Smoreking (T)  (c)  16:52, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I've got 610  Blue Ninjakoopa Talk 16:53, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

I believe saw Paragoomba fails in there. Smoreking (T)  (c)  20:56, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
 * You didn't piss anyone off, dude. And I don't hate you, I just hate how you think lowly of yourself but you try and act like you're better than others here.  Blue Ninjakoopa Talk 22:52, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

LOTSA SPEGGETI! Masterman  20  09  20:58, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

IRC? random stuff. Masterman  20  09  21:02, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Okay. Smoreking (T)  (c)  21:03, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Hey
I want to know now this: Do you think your place is here, at the Wiki, or in my crew?  Blue Ninjakoopa Talk 09:03, 11 January 2009 (UTC)


 * What is "Here", the wiki? Smoreking (T)  (c)  13:51, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah  Blue Ninjakoopa Talk 18:11, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
 * ZOMFG THAT MEENS YOU SED THIS WIKI TWICE. Smoreking (T)  (c)  18:16, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I want you to be active within my crew, not so much here. lol  Blue Ninjakoopa Talk 18:39, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Okay. Go to the IRC, me, SZL, and Shadowcrest are there. Smoreking (T)  (c)  18:40, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

OBJECTION! I think i should be a ownage level 7! Reason. (I'm saying all this in a nice way btw cos i like you (Not in that way))

1)I have brawled xtreme and have beaten him every time

2) It took you a while to take out my meta knight and sonic! (Well, you still beat them...)

Anyways, i hope this changes you mind lulz!  ~Teh Blue  Blur~ ... ~You're too slow!~ 18:34, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for changing it. :D  ~Teh Blue  Blur~ ... ~You're too slow!~ 20:07, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

lol
Stop taking my stocks when I'm winning, dude.  Blue Ninjakoopa Talk 23:32, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

U gave into TBB^? wow. IRC? Masterman  20  09  02:12, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Nah, I gotta go. Bye. Smoreking (T)  (c)  02:13, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

T_T Masterman   20  09  02:13, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

messin around brawl? Masterman  20  09  00:34, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

I'M GOOD, NOT OKAY! ' ~Teh Blue ' Blur~ A revolution begins... 16:07, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

YESH
Thanks for being so active at mah boards!  Blue Ninjakoopa Talk 17:13, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Can you help my cousin Linkowns2 with a coustom sig. Falcon pawnch 21:12, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Sure. Smoreking (T)  (c)  21:15, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Thank you Linkowns2 (talk) 21:16, 18 January 2009 (UTC) Make it Green Black and Red Linkowns2 (talk) 21:19, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

did u check out mah DINNER theme on proboards? Masterman  20  09  00:25, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

ur page just got more epic. Masterman  20  09  02:56, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Brawl? Alex25, King of Randomness! 23:47, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Deleted images
Well, I do get the idea now but why do YOU have them on YOUR page? Hmm? ILoveWario (talk) 00:41, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
 * External coding. Smoreking (T)  (c)  01:57, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Hmmm...
I did do that on this page, and I'll start doing that from now on. Thanks for the heads-up.  Fried beef  1    1/26/09!   14:22, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

I think I have! ' ~Teh Blue ' Blur~ A revolution begins. 20:35, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Are you bored? I've got nothing to do right now, and thank Guthix (heh) that school is cancelled for me today because of the snow, and upcoming rain and sleet. Wanna brawl in a few minutes?  MarioGalaxy Talk 16:08, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

So, what do you want? So what if you pwned my sonic if you've come to humiliate me. ' ~Teh Blue ' Blur~ A revolution begins. 16:29, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

SW:SIG
Bet you didn't know that I signature subpage. ;) --Sky (t · c · w) 23:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I didn't know that, but yours fits in the signature box, so it is legal under SIGN(rememba teh "n" ;) ), but Charitwo's doesn't, so it is illegal. Smoreking (T)  (c)  23:12, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I agree. Charitwo's sig fills 4 to five lines of text space. It needs to be changed.  Blue Ninjakoopa Talk 23:14, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
 * C2 doesn't edit anymore here anyway, so... why does it matter so much to you two? --Sky (t · c · w) 23:15, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Because it's still policy. And the way he uses it violates policy. He's supposed to put, otherwise everything has to reload or something when it gets changed. Smoreking (T)  (c)  23:17, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Man, off Wiki correspondence is moar common than I thought...  Blue Ninjakoopa Talk 23:19, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Man, I'm not communicating off-wiki. :,( --Sky (t · c · w) 23:22, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
 * What? Can we just go over to IRC if we're going to keep talking like this? Smoreking (T)  (c)  23:23, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
 * In response to what you said on Sky's talk page, you is valuable.  Blue Ninjakoopa Talk 23:31, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

TBB
That's my problem, not yours. It's not really gonna hurt is it? So what's it got to do with you? ' ~Teh Blue ' Blur~ A revolution begins. 15:33, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
 * It's just annoying as hell when people do stupid stuff because it makes them feel special. Smoreking (T)  (c)  15:34, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

--__-- The Blue scrub... Thats really mature. ' ~Teh Blue ' Blur~ A revolution begins. 15:46, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
 * ? At least I know how to spell and use punctuation properly.  Smoreking (T)  (c)  15:50, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
 * When did i spell something rong? (heh) ' ~Teh Blue ' Blur~ A revolution begins. 15:51, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Many times, and you failed at using an apostrophe in the first post in this series of indents. Smoreking (T)  (c)  15:53, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
 * ... Thinks about what you have to say before you say it. Look at the top, where BNK's saying about how you archived you're page too early. And, who cares about a simple apostrophy. Anyways, why are we arguing here? You're the one who's always going on about the SW policies and here we are. Arguing away. ' ~Teh Blue ' Blur~ A revolution begins. 15:58, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
 * You spelled "apostrophe" wrong, and I couldn't understand that first sentence. Also, arguing is not against policy, as long as no PA's get involved. Smoreking (T)  (c)  16:00, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
 * This is driving me insane. AND I'M A VERY SANE PERSON.' ' ~Teh Blue ' Blur~ A revolution begins. 16:03, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Unsigned. Too many apostrophes. No you're not apparently. Smoreking (T)  (c)  16:04, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
 * What do you expect after what i wrote just above me.... ' ~Teh Blue ' Blur~ A revolution begins. 16:06, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

You're both doin it rong. Grammar wars are not cruise control for cool. If this entire section had a point I missed it. thx --  Shadow  crest  16:08, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Wat. Smoreking (T)  (c)  16:09, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Heh?!' ~Teh Blue ' Blur~ A revolution begins. 16:11, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Are you just trying to annoy me? ' ~Teh Blue ' Blur~ A revolution begins. 16:29, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Broken Links
Perhaps you can help me understand why a broken link is unacceptable. I mean, it's a red link. Kind of like a blue link. -and because it's red it makes the article worse? If something can be explained more fully on another page, that's when we should link to it, right? -And if that page hasn't been written yet? -You want us to write it?? And what if we don't have the knowledge, time, or even the desire to do that? -Does that mean that something that can be explained better on another page doesn't deserve a link? Wiki's are designed so that one person alone doesn't have to do all the work. I really just don't understand the problem, so I would appreciate your input on this. Zixor (talk) 03:46, 22 December 2008 (UTC)


 * They just plain look bad, and clikcing on them to find an unwritten page isn't good either. SmoreKing Happy Holidays! 23:59, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

I would have to plainly disagree with you that they just plain look bad. Red is no different than blue. Just as people know that a blue link will take them to a page that has been written, they too know that a red link will take them to a page which has not (which is also spelled out when hovering over the link). "Finding" an unwritten page is a "good" opportunity to contribute. If a link belongs in an article, then it should be there; Red or blue. That's my argument. -and I'm willing to discuss it further. Zixor (talk) 03:42, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

-Please respond, thanks. Zixor (talk) 17:48, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I can see your point, but red links make an article look unprofessional, and when you click on them, they lead you to a page that doesn't exist. Chances are, red links don't need to be made, so they aren't always an amazing place to contribute. Smoreking (T)  (c)  18:52, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

What exactly about a red link makes a page look unprofessional? -The fact that it appears incomplete? When is an article ever really "complete"?

Certainly there are a vast wealth of poor broken links, to pages that probably never need to, and never will be written. My concern is not for them, but for the others; the useful ones.

The proposed solution to the problem is most likely to either remove the link, or to write the page. Assuming that the page should in fact be written (which is something I doubt is often properly considered, in favor of quickly removing an "eyesore"), there are still a number of problems. -Perhaps the information has already been written in another article. Assuming that one has even considered this, one still may not be able to locate said information using this wiki's search tool. I imagine that it is actually quite a likely scenario, and that writing a new page could be a waste of time and energy, cluttering the server with unneeded articles. A broken link may be a much better solution for everyone, allowing others to help in determining the best course of action; whether that is deleting a link to a page that shouldn't exist, creating a proper link to an article where the information has already been written, writing a new article, etc.

There are many other potential advantages to broken links as well. The other, and more likely, alternative to properly witting a quality article is to quickly write a stub. There are several problems as a result of this approach. Where a broken link is clear in its absence of information, a working link to a poorly written stub is misleading, a waste of time, and may reflect even more poorly upon the viewer than the original red link.

I can definitely think of plenty more to say, but this would take me a lot of time and effort to explain. I am fully willing to do this, but for now I'll attempt to keep my arguments shorter and more concise, so that you can respond to them more fully and directly.

Broken links can be bad, as can anything, but this is entirely contextual, and they are not inherently negative. Zixor (talk) 01:09, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

-Are you interested in continuing this discussion with me? Zixor (talk) 22:46, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Understood. Well, I'd at least ask that you not remove broken links without proper consideration. Thanks. Zixor (talk) 21:20, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I shall do so. Smoreking (T)  (c)  21:21, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Do you approve of this? Seriously...
http://cd-i.wikia.com/wiki/User_talk:Gargomon251 What the fuck man.... - Gargomon251 (talk) 04:23, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
 * http://cd-i.wikia.com/wiki/User:Gargomon251
 * In addition I've been blocked. For no reason. - Gargomon251 (talk) 06:29, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Nothing smore, nothing. ' ~Teh Blue ' Blur~ A revolution begins. 08:21, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

ಠ_ಠ
Proboards, rite nao.  Blue  Ninjakoopa  20:22, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

YEY! Can i come?? ' ~Teh Blue ' Blur~ ~You're too slow!~ 20:24, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
 * NOE.  Blue  Ninjakoopa  20:27, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

Poke Table
Helping. Gives names of move used, etc. (Pssst.  Spring colors sig.)   Miles ( talk)   22:03, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
 * It's still winter for a while, and thanks, I totally forgot about that. Smoreking (T)  (c)  22:26, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

Yes!
SW was going slow for me, so I thought I could free up some server space :P  Fried beef  1    Love   23:03, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

Listen, can we cut the crap now? Listen, MK is cheap, I am cheap. You are - Just look at BNK's talk page. ' ~Teh Blue ' Blur~ ~You're too slow!~ 15:32, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Uhh, sure....? Smoreking (T)  (c)  16:01, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
 * For real? Are you serious? Just like that! Are we friends again? Oh, and last night, was that you who i was going against, cos it had the initials, "SK" Which can stand for Smoreking... ' ~Teh Blue ' Blur~ ~You're too slow!~ 16:06, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Sure, we're (kind of)friends, but I'll still point out policies to you, and no, I wasn't on last night. Smoreking (T)  (c)  19:19, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Meh, I suppose that's better than you wanting to kill me and want me to die! (Do I have permission to put you on my friends list? Hey! Dejavoo! (Forgot how to spell it...)) ' ~Teh Blue ' Blur~ ~You're too slow!~ 20:17, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Careful
Listen Smore, you do not necessarily need to speak like you did on Silvie's suggestion. There are people out there who might be offended by your use of Jesus' name. Not me, but there would be others. Please refrain from doing that.  Gutripper Speak  05:28, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Chill, 'Tripper.  Blue  Ninjakoopa  06:56, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Look, I'm just saying. Would you like it if someone made a racist comment to you and someone tried to do something about it and someone told them to chill? I'm just sick of these extremely bad choice words when there are hundreds of alternatives.  Gutripper Speak 
 * Okay. Smoreking (T)  (c)  16:24, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

y hullo thar boi
RfA pls.  Blue  Ninjakoopa  16:38, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
 * not not nao. Smoreking (T)  (c)  16:38, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
 * y?  Blue  Ninjakoopa  16:55, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Not really in the mood rite nao, I might go sometime this week though. Go to IRC. Smoreking (T)  (c)  17:02, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Mah Boi
Sorry, I Had Too...  Kperfekt  BURN!!!  Revert That! 21:29, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

YOU. REGISTER. ME. WE MUST BRAAAAAAAAAAAAWL!  Kperfekt  BURN!!!  Revert That! 21:32, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I have you registered, and okay. I'll be on in 10 min. Smoreking (T)  (c)  21:33, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
 * quicklyyyyyyy  Kperfekt  BURN!!!  Revert That! 21:40, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

wait i need ur friend code  Kperfekt  BURN!!!  Revert That! 21:44, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
 * 4811-6629-6231

Friend Roster
Howdy, I'm looking to fill up my Friend Roster, so (if you want to) gimme your Friend Code and I'll add it! -Feel free to add my Wii code too, for vault data.

Instant messaging is by far the best way to schedule Brawls (as well as converse), so add my screen name (Zixor69) to your buddy list if you have an IM client. If you don't, well: we'll just have to run into each other randomly on WFC, as I've found SmashWiki alone to be an ineffective means of coordination.

Super Smash Bros. Brawl: 4253-3181-1627

Wii console: 1099-4392-9804-5732

-I'm on WFC right now. Zixor (talk) 21:57, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
 * FC is right above this section. Smoreking (T)  (c)  22:14, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

So, no IM or Vault, I assume? Zixor (talk) 22:24, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Anyway, I enjoyed those matches, despite some lag. Zixor (talk) 04:11, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

OK
I would but I have no idea how I got that signature in the first place, if you could tell me that would be very helpful. JMASTER
 * Just put Jay man (talk) in the signature box under Special:Preferences, and click the raw signature box. If you want a customized one, I suggest talking to Gutripper. Smoreking (T)  (c)  15:38, 19 February 2009 (UTC)