Board Thread:SmashWiki Business/@comment-12408658-20130912210035/@comment-7697305-20130913225022

I thought of the former more as a corollary to the latter, so I thought it would look something like this:

"Assume (within reason) that there is a reason behind every edit another user makes. If you have evidence that an edit was made in error, revert it once with an appropriate explanation. If they revert your reversion take it to their message wall instead of reverting again."

...'Course, now that I've written that out, I agree that it shouldn't be merged, as well.