Smashpedia:Requests for rollback

This page is for requesting that one is granted rollback powers on SmashWiki.

Rules

 * Only self-nominations are allowed.
 * All new nominees should post their name below as a in a level 3 header ( ===Username=== ). Underneath, the user should state why he/she would like to be granted Rollback powers.
 * Users who wish to support, oppose, or comment on the nomination may do so underneath the person requesting Rollback powers.
 * After sufficient time has passed to allow all users who wish to express an opinion the chance to do so, a decision will be made based on community consensus as to whether or not the request will succeed. Once a decision has been made, the discussion will be archived and moved to an appropriate subpage.

Archives

 * KP317
 * Pikamander2
 * Miles.oppenheimer
 * Shadowcrest
 * JtM
 * GalaxiaD
 * Charitwo
 * Toon Ganondorf
 * Defiant Elements
 * Blue Ninjakoopa
 * Smorekingxg456
 * Cheezperson
 * Oxico
 * MarioGalaxy
 * Y462
 * Fried beef1
 * ParaGoomba348
 * Gutripper
 * Semicolon
 * Blue Ninjakoopa (2)

The Blue Blur
Hello. I'm The Blue Blur, also known as TBB or Blue/Blur. I'm requesting rollback because I belive I can do a good deal of vandalism reverting. I, like other users on this great wiki are always watching that "Recent changes" box and checking for vandals etc. I know some people here on Smashwiki like me, and some don't, but let's put that aside for my request. I promise I will use this feature for Vandalism reverting only, not for greed, power or any other negative aspects of this feature. Anyways, thanks for reading and voting and, let's hope it all goes well. Remember, honest votes please! Thanks, --' ~Teh Blue ' Blur~ ~You're too slow!~ 13:33, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Votes/Comments

 * Strong support. "You're active, and you're not a vandal. IMO, those are the only things that matter." --Posted by Pikamander2   (Talk)  at 13:35, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong Oppose. You show little to no need for the tool, as you do little vandalism reverting, but rather just reverting of other user's edits because you think they're wrong. Also, you fail to follow some policies, if that matters. Smoreking (T)  (c)  13:44, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong Oppose - 1)You're only running because a lot of other users have the tool, and 2) most of your "reverts" have been reverted back by other users because of your terrible grammar and ill temper (look on my talk page for the bolded text in all caps). Also, per Smoreking.  Blue  Ninjakoopa  15:16, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Support As per Pikamander. Everyone's going to say "I'm voting 'cause he's in the same crew", nut I'm not so if you hold that idea, hold it to yourself.  Ike's Best Buddy / Bird Of Prey Don't try me 
 * Support Along with Pikaminder and IBB. Unknown the   Hedgehog  16:23, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Neutral. Some reverts, some policy violations.  They cancel each other out, leaving you with no positive or negative points about you, IMO.  Miles ( talk)   16:28, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Support- Who cares people, it's rollback  --  Shadow  crest  16:31, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh, so now rollback is just given out? Come on, I stopped trolling TBB a long time ago lol  Blue  Ninjakoopa  16:54, 16 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Support - Just because Blue said no and it's fun contradicting him. Also what Shadowcrest said. Shade  487  z  16:32, 16 February 2009 (UTC)