Smashpedia:Requests for rollback/Dr. Pain 99

Result: Passed Clarinet Hawk (talk · contributions) 17:22, June 29, 2010 (UTC)

Dr. Pain 99
Hello. I am Dr. Pain 99, an active contributor to this wiki. I have been here for over a year, but I only started actively contributing this month. Even though I haven't contributed very long, I believe I am ready to request rollback. I currently have almost over 400 edits, and over 200 of them are to mainspace articles. I have reverted vandalism multiple times, and a couple of times rollback would have really helped because the vandal vandalized in multiple edits, forcing me to undo every single one of the vandal's edits. With rollback powers, I will be able help protect this wiki from vandals faster and more efficently. Dr. Pain 99   Talk  23:00, June 24, 2010 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) I got no problems here.  Clarinet Hawk (talk · contributions) 01:56, June 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) He patrols the place a lot.-- Mega  Tron1  XD  Decepticon.png 01:57, June 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * 3) Understands polices and uses undo well.  --Havoc  Reaper '48  02:09, June 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * 4) He hasn't been here long, but he is very active and shows an active intent to revert vandalism. Omega   Tyrant  [[Image: TyranitarMS.png|25px ]] 05:53, June 25, 2010 (UTC)

Neutral

 * Meh. Not to sound crass, but do we really need more rollbackers? Miles ( talk)   02:39, June 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * Why not? This is a large wiki (it's mentioned on Wikipedia), and the larger it grows the more vandals it'll attract. A new generation of video game consoles is comming, and with it a new Smash game. I think we should have as many good users as we can. Mr. Anon (talk) 03:16, June 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * There's no proof there's going to be another Smash (I agree it's probable, but still). And as it is, we have plenty of bcrats, sysops and rollbackers around in my opinion.  Miles ( talk)   13:35, June 25, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

 * @Miles: I can understand how we can have too many admins and bureaucrats, but how can we have too many rollbackers? Omega   Tyrant  [[Image: TyranitarMS.png|25px ]] 16:07, June 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * I mostly just don't see it as especially helpful to promote more when we have enough. Miles ( talk)   16:27, June 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * So even if a candidate is qualified, you don't believe we should give them rollback just because there is already a large amount of active rollbackers? Omega   Tyrant  [[Image: TyranitarMS.png|25px ]] 16:53, June 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes. Miles ( talk)   18:56, June 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * Hmm, I don't think that should automatically disqualify a qualified candidate but that is your opinion. Omega   Tyrant  [[Image: TyranitarMS.png|25px ]] 19:03, June 25, 2010 (UTC)