Board Thread:Super Smash Bros. Discussion/@comment-25759697-20150526011038/@comment-26262392-20150722032026

Tylight wrote: Dark Knight 178 wrote: Tylight wrote: TheFmeister wrote: Well, to be honest, Lucina is the faster of the two but Marth has a further reach and is much more effective when played well; the downside is that Marth is much harder to play. So I enjoy the challenge of playing Marth which is why I prefer him over Lucina. Dark Knight 178 wrote: Marth may have increased range but Lucina is faster which gives her a better range if you REALLY think about it also Lucina is moree agile which makes it easier to avoid the attackseses and be better and also jumping on the platformy levels. You're both morons. They're exactly the same other than the lack of tipper and their height/range (which is a minimal difference). That's it. And no, that doesn't give her better range. It doesn't matter how fast she is. Sheik is hella fast but you're a dolt if you think she out-ranges Shulk (needles aside, of course) The Point is that Lucina is faster and more agile which makes her better because she has more manoeuvring ability and also I wreck Marth (Amiibo Lv.50/My Brother) always with Lucina. She is not faster nor more agile. They are exactly the same. Their frame data is 1:1.

And it doesn't matter that you wreck your Amiibo or your brother with Lucina. I can wreck Sheik players with Ganondorf. GANONDORF TOP TIER CONFIRM?????????????????????????

Quit talking about things you know nothing about. I will quit talking about things I know naught about but this is something that I do know about. Lucina is faster which means she is better from my point of view not necessarily everybody else's though. But to me Lucina is better also Marth isn't a newcomer so we should stop talking about her-HIM.