Thread:TheSMASHFan/@comment-12408658-20140104005524/@comment-16072884-20140116023542

"You had made your arguments against all of mine as well." How do you know that I was finished responding to the things you said before I got blocked? Arguments aren't about both sides stating their opinion, and then not being allowed to respond to each others' points.

"At that point, you declared yourself the winner" "but instead of allowing others to decide, you made the decision yourself." I did not declare myself the winner; I declared the discussion not fully resolved yet. I did not revert the edit because I thought I had won, but because it was not fully resolved yet.

"The decision, ultimately, is an admin one" I said that admins can make mistakes as well.

''""our constant usage of 'make changes now and discuss later' isn't proper. You are still deciding what is proper and what is not, instead of letting the admins and the other communities weighing in decide. Just because you want the community to run a certain way, doesn't mean it should.""'' I believe that our constant usage of 'make changes now and discuss later' isn't proper. I believe that it's not good for the wiki. I'm letting people respond to this post I made; I posted the suggested policy change, and I didn't write it down or anything right away, and I'm waiting for more people to respond to it. I also doubt that any user or admin here would say that it's not a good idea to discuss something and then add in the changes.

"The decision, ultimately, is an admin one (even if it means, as sometimes occurs, users create their own wikia on the same subject)" On this wiki, regular users have the right to determine how the wiki runs as well. Just because a user isn't an admin doesn't mean their ideas on how to run the wiki should be arbitrarily ignored and discounted.

As for the revert though, I'm not entirely sure if I was justified in my decision to do so, and I'm not proud that I did it and caused a whole deal of drama to occur because of it.