Smashpedia:Requests for rollback

This page is for requesting that one is granted rollback powers on SmashWiki.

Rules

 * Only self-nominations are allowed.
 * All new nominees should post their name below as a in a level 3 header ( ===Username=== ). Underneath, the user should state why he/she would like to be granted Rollback powers.
 * Users who wish to support, oppose, or comment on the nomination may do so underneath the person requesting Rollback powers.
 * After sufficient time has passed to allow all users who wish to express an opinion the chance to do so, a decision will be made based on community consensus as to whether or not the request will succeed. Once a decision has been made, the discussion will be archived and moved to an appropriate subpage.

Archives

 * Blue Ninjakoopa
 * Charitwo
 * Cheezperson
 * ClonedPickle
 * Defiant Elements
 * Fried beef1
 * GalaxiaD
 * GT5162
 * Gutripper
 * JtM
 * KP317
 * MarioGalaxy
 * Miles.oppenheimer
 * Oxico
 * ParaGoomba348
 * Pikamander2
 * Semicolon
 * Shadowcrest
 * Smorekingxg456
 * The Blue Blur
 * Toon Ganondorf
 * Y462

Bek The Conqueror
Hello, everybody. I am Bek the Conqueror, and I am requesting rollback rights, obviously. I have made somewhere in the ballpark of 1,900 edits, and have helped to ID/ wipe the trail of 8 vandals at last count. I am not counting vandals that I found but were blocked by the admins before I could notify them of the damage. I have mostly been categorizing images as of late, but I have also made many edits regarding links to disambiguation pages, etc. I already patrol the "Recent Changes" page to find any possible vandals, and I generally keep my cool, save for one incident regarding the proposed speedy deletion of my userpage, which I fully admit, I did not handle all that well. However, I have looked over SW's policies since then and I have learned my lesson. I also patrol the "Broken Redirects" and "Double Redirects" logs. I think that I could use rollback well, and I await your decision on the matter.-- Bek  (talk)  21:17, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Votes/Comments

 * Moderate support. The image categorization alone shows a high level of dedication to this wiki, and that dedication is much of what's earning this vote. The rest is a history of combatting vandalism on Bek's part. Miles ( talk)   21:50, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Support. He's active and does have some reverts to this wiki.  Cloned Pickle  22:10, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Support he has teh reverts. Smoreking (T)  (c)  19:04, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Support Although Bek's actual number of reverts is not huge, he's active, dedicated, and he's demonstrated a willingness to combat vandals. I'm confident that he'd put rollback to good use.  –  Defiant Elements   +talk  04:25, 12 April 2009 (UTC)