User talk:Blue Ninjakoopa

Don't Make me Regret This
Ok, you're back. I don't really know why I'm doing this, except I have this strange feeling that it's the right thing to do. However, considering that this was about the tenth time that you have been unbanned, I'm going to set some ground rules down for you. Are your rules stricter than other users? Yes. Are they hash? Yes. Unfair? Maybe. Do I care? No. Has any user who has ever done remotely as much as you ever been given another chance? No. So enjoy the fact that you are being allowed to edit because I would have been fully within my rights to have banned your IP months ago. Clarinet Hawk (talk · contributions) 23:47, February 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) This is your last chance. If you get banned again, not only will I ban your account, I will ban your IP and every IP you've edited from that I can track down.  I will also delete every one of your user pages, blogs, forums you've started, etc.  It will be as if you never had been here.
 * 2) Don't flame/PA anyone. Ever.  I don't care if your user page gets vandalized, or your worst enemy makes an account.  Leave it to me to deal with them.  You keep your cool.
 * 3) Don't talk about people getting banned. In fact, if I see the word "ban" in your posts, I'm going to take it as a strong indication that you are requesting a ban.
 * 4) Don't be a drama queen/martyr. SmashWiki is not Tianamen square or colonial America and you are not a rebel.
 * 5) Don't request rollback. Deal with just having to use the undo button.  If I honestly think that you need rollback, I will approach you about it.
 * 6) If I seen you requesting sysop, I will ban you for disruption.
 * 7) Don't brag about this on other wikis or to other users who have been banned. If they show up saying "why did BNK get unbanned and not me" I might forget that you didn't request sysop.  :)
 * 8) Use Common Sense. If you don't think that it's a good idea to post what you are about to, don't do it.
 * Alrighty.  Blue  Ninjakoopa  23:50, February 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * Uh, one more thing; could you remove the information box and archive links from my twelfth archive?  Blue  Ninjakoopa  23:53, February 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * Gracias.  Blue  Ninjakoopa  23:57, February 25, 2010 (UTC)

I want to drop by and say thank you for proving me right about letting you come back. You have been an exceptional user since you have returned. Thank you. Clarinet Hawk (talk · contributions) 03:00, July 15, 2010 (UTC)

...
... ... ... ... YAY! L33t  Silvie  I see wat u did thar... |undefined

You removed my Ganondorf page add-on, I see. It's rather crucial to say that Ganondorf isn't as bad as tier-supporting players like to pass on, so that those wanting information on Ganondorf and stumbling upon pile after pile of complaints won't get turned off or get the wrong idea. You see, I think, you should include a disclaimer as such for all characters, saying the pros and cons hardly matter, and what does matter is the own player's effort values into the character. Reply back. SSBC We are the SSBC. We rule Youtube. We rule the world. (talk) 04:30, February 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * Your post on the Gannondorf page is hardly a good example of an acceptable first post, this post is only marginally better, and your signature is absolutely not acceptable. You might want to shape up, because you are on the fast track to becoming a very good example of a bad account.  Clarinet Hawk (talk · contributions) 07:32, February 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * OK, that was tasteless. But still, please learn what this and other wikis are about.  Tiers exist, read.  And change your signature.  Clarinet Hawk (talk · contributions) 07:40, February 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, those kinds of comments don't really belong on articles for the characters, to be frank. Although I highly discourage this, you might want to state your opinions on the talk page.  Blue  Ninjakoopa  04:44, February 27, 2010 (UTC)

I believe they do matter, seeing as your limits of your skill with the character is your knowledge of the character. You seem to think my respect for Ganondorf is unreasonable. I think that personal freedom in choosing our best characters is a wise liberty. Tiers should not exist, as any Ganondorf player could have a better tournament strategy then any other tournament player as a differentiating character, and utilize it and win. It's not surefire, but it's not impossible as most people seem to think. (I see people being discriminated against for saying Ganondorf could defeat a Meta Knight on fair terms in this Wiki, right this very day). And I need to keep my signature, I operate my own Wiki and it would be impossible to keep both Wiki's signatures on fair terms. And if you wish to ban me for speaking against what I find false or wronged in this Wiki, it's your choice. You can exercise your hunger to ban a user (made very evident by your beginning of the talk page), and also keep dislike towards Ganondorf sound, and silence me from trying to be in the right, ever again. We are the SSBC. We rule Youtube. We rule the world. (talk) 21:33, February 27, 2010 (UTC)


 * You can make different signatures for different wikis; you just have to do it in a bit of a roundabout way. For example, my signature is, which uses whatever's on said page as a sig - since the page is different on each wiki, the sig will be.
 * You have every right to enjoy using any character you want, and no one has any right to ban you for such. But as is said here, your assersion of "tiers should not exist" is ignorant of the fact that, while skill and strategy are the biggest deciders of a match, some characters are simply better under tournament rules. And remember, the tier list is a report, not a recommendation. You can't win by blindly follwing it, but you can't win without accepting its existence.
 * (And of course, don't forget that the tier list only applies to players at the highest possible metagame level - and that there are other tier lists at different levels.) Toomai Glittershine [[Image:Toomai.png|20px]] eXemplary Logic  The Stats Guy  The Table Designer  22:20, February 27, 2010 (UTC)

I don't see as to how people can "determine" the outcome of a match simply by character matchups. Strategy and skill is what a match needs. Slow bulk by no pales in comparison to others of higher speed calibur. The only conditional play is enviromental changes. I see what you're trying to say. You're thinking of, under those interruptions in the battle, that some characters may have an advantage over others in the shifting terrain. (Like a stage with only four spaces, all falling blocks, with four players, which would rely largely on your jumping abilities to stay alive; Meta Knight would prove very effective, while many others would meet trouble). However, you never know; maybe all hazards can one day be evaded with all characters.
 * Take this conversation here, where it belongs, s'il vous plait. Also, I do wonder what you meant by "your hunger to ban a user (made very evident by your beginning of the talk page)".  The mods here are most certainly not as banhappy as most make them out to be.  L33t   Silvie  I see wat u did thar... |undefined 02:28, February 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * Silvie, you're not wanted.
 * Now, whatever do you mean by that? L33t   Silvie  I see wat u did thar... |undefined 03:44, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
 * SSBC clearly meant to put that comment at the end of this section.  Penguin  of  Death   01:54, March 4, 2010 (UTC)

OH... MY... GOD...
Your unbanned. Congrats.  Kperfekt  BURN!!!   Revert That!  00:53, February 28, 2010 (UTC)

Meaning, I was having this conversation with Blue Ninjakoopa alone.


 * 1) Start signing your comments. It's not hard, and I'm not asking. 2)This is the internet, it's not private, and you don't even run the place or have any significant power on it. Don't tell other people to butt out. Semicolon (talk) 03:21, March 5, 2010 (UTC)

Hey you
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/19/Random_Acts_of_Kindness_Barnstar.png :D Miles ( talk)   01:16, March 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you!  BNK [ E 01:17, March 8, 2010 (UTC)

I note with approval that you have been contributing valuable edits, you have handled yourself appropriately, and you are taking your chance seriously. I am surprised and pleased by your new attitude. I lobbied for your unbanning, and I am happy to see you have behaved as I predicted you would. In a phrase, thank you. Semicolon (talk) 05:02, March 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. :)  BNK [ E 22:55, March 9, 2010 (UTC)

RE:Kirby Wiki logo
I've got 3 questions.

1: What was the point with this message ?

2: Why do you say I didn't make it ?

3: What text did I actually remove ?

--Mr Alex (T) 02:16, March 23, 2010 (UTC)
 * I've got 3 answers.
 * 1: Your user page states that you've created logos for several wikia sites, and one of those said sites happens to be Kirby Wiki, which you didn't make the logo for. I wanted to make that clear so confusion wouldn't arouse. Also, I can't edit your user page. :$


 * 2: Because you didn't. The upload history says so!


 * 3: ,


 * -- BNK [ E 02:54, March 23, 2010 (UTC)


 * By the way, I did make the logo. You have to be an administrator to replace a logo. Since I'm not an admin in the Kirby wiki, I couldnt do it in my own, so I uploaded the logo and asked an admin (in this case, Max2) to replace the logo for me. It does states in the page that the logo is made by Max2, but all the credit goes to me. As a proof, click here to see the discution where I propose Max2 to replace the old logo by mine, and click here to see another file of the logo uploaded by me six hours before Max2 reuploaded it as the new logo. No other files of the logo has been uploaded before mine.


 * And also, what's the big deal if I remove all the discutions that I no longer need in my talk page ?


 * --Mr Alex (T) 03:28, March 23, 2010 (UTC)
 * Sorry for the misunderstanding. I thought Meta58 or this one German user had made it.
 * And you aren't allowed to remove text, even if you feel it isn't necessary. Also: discussion*  BNK [ E 12:21, March 23, 2010 (UTC)

Wow
I mistook you for many other users when I first joined this site, I apologize. Also, have you contacted my Youtube site yet? Also, what is "non-reverted mainspace edits"? SSBC (talk) 00:26, March 31, 2010 (UTC)
 * It's edits that weren't reverted. 98.111.95.78 00:30, March 31, 2010 (UTC)
 * Could you provide a link? I'll send a request. Or, you could add me. The link to my channel is on my user page.  BNK [ E 01:28, March 31, 2010 (UTC)

I might as well add you. Also, further asking questions, what does it mean to revert an edit? SSBC (talk) 01:57, March 31, 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, on a page's history page, for the last edit there's a button next to it that says "undo". When you do that, it undoes everything that edit did. It's called a revert alternatively. 98.111.95.78 02:01, March 31, 2010 (UTC)
 * From my previous comment: Any user who makes edits continuing this discussion elsewhere during that time will be banned.  You're both on a short leash.  Don't stretch it any further.  Clarinet Hawk (talk · contributions) 06:36, March 31, 2010 (UTC)

Oh, hello Clarinet Hawk. How great it is to see you again. Not really, assuming that we're not continuing the discussion at all, I'm just asking a higher member of the site some terms I don't know, but... SSBC (talk) 10:25, March 31, 2010 (UTC)
 * Hence why I didn't ban you. I simply was reminding you to be careful.  If I honestly thought you were trying to circumvent protection, you would be gone.  As it stands, you're doing yourself absolutely no favors mocking me.  But to answer your question, a main-space edit is any edit to a page in the main-space (i.e. not User, User Talk, Forum, Talk, etc.) and it not being reverted should be pretty self explanatory.  Try making some.  Clarinet Hawk (talk · contributions) 14:43, March 31, 2010(UTC)

I won't remove what is on my account. Once there, it stays. SSBC (talk) 20:07, March 31, 2010 (UTC)
 * Would you mind explaing what the hell you are talking about? Clarinet Hawk (talk · contributions) 20:50, March 31, 2010 (UTC)

I don't want to undo, revert, etc. what's on my mainspace. It's there to stay. SSBC (talk) 22:28, March 31, 2010 (UTC)
 * There is no "your" mainspace. You have your own userspace (as noted by the User: prefix), but even then there are restrictions on what you can do. I don't know why this wiki doesn't have it (anymore?), but the default message on other wikis below the edit box says "Please note: If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly or redistributed by others, do not submit it." <-- good principle to follow on wikis regarding mainspace contributions. If that's not your style, then don't wiki. Shadowcrest  22:41, March 31, 2010 (UTC)

Gee, I can't tell if you're trying to put some weight on my shoulders, give me wonderful advice, or whatever... SSBC (talk) 19:27, April 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * He's simply trying to tell you what the mainspace is. Let me help. Ganondorf (SSBB): mainspace. User:PenguinofDeath: userspace. This page is in the user talk namespace as the page name starts "User talk:". So far, almost all of your edits have been to the user talk namespace. (To see a breakdown of your edits by namespace, see Special:Editcount/SSBC.) Clarinet Hawk is telling you to start making useful edits to pages like "Ganondorf (SSBB)", because at the moment you're not contributing anything to the wiki, and you're taking up other users' time, which they could be spending improving the wiki.  Penguin  of  Death   20:11, April 2, 2010 (UTC)

I see. But if I contribute anything, it'll most likely be stale or inaccurate information, which is why I haven't done anything yet. SSBC (talk) 02:28, April 3, 2010 (UTC)

that sonic page
No edit wars. I can't believe I'm cutting you this slack. I clearly stepped in to handle it, which means you should step out. You're not banned because I'm in a good mood and because as far as I can tell you're right. You're smarter than this, BNK. Nothing like that ever again. Please. Semicolon (talk) 00:13, April 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * Edit war?! This site is a madhouse... isn't it? SSBC (talk) 19:29, April 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * What are you talking about, and what was the purpose of your comment?  Penguin  of  Death   20:11, April 2, 2010 (UTC)

Why so serious? SSBC (talk) 02:28, April 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * PenguinofDeath is renowned for being a very serious administrator. He is thoroughly cunning and happily eats anything.  BNK [ E 02:48, April 3, 2010 (UTC)

Oh. Hello, Penguin. Death awaits those who claim to be a Penguin of Death though, I forewarn you. SSBC (talk) 02:56, April 3, 2010 (UTC)
 *  The Penguin of Death is actually a poem by Edward Monkton about a penguin who people go to when they want to end their life (according to PoD's talk page). He prefers to be called PoD, by the way, as he appears to show disliking of the villain. Also, make sure you indent when replying.  BNK [ E 03:00, April 3, 2010 (UTC)

Reverts
I understand you revering that as it was clearly vandalism/P.A.'s/aginst policy. I don't have a problem with you helping out in user conflicts, just remembering your track record with user conflict in the past, I might advise against it. You have been a very good contributor since you came back and I'd honestly hate to see it runined because of one mistake from a user conflict.

Also, I really haven't taken the time to thank you for everything you've done since comming back, so I will let you know now how much I apprciate the edits that you have been making. Clarinet Hawk (talk · contributions) 04:26, April 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * Sorry about that; I'll try to keep more to myself. And you're welcome.  BNK [ E 11:52, April 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * Regarding your reverts on Sala's talk: you weren't wrong per se to keep reverting, but after he reverted you one or two times it probably would have just been easier for you to just go to the noticeboard and stop bothering to revert him until an admin handled it. Just for future reference. Shadowcrest  13:46, April 5, 2010 (UTC)

I... but...
...but that image of those three Subspace duplicates is terriquality. Can't we just use my nice shiny G&W one from that there DOJO? Miles ( talk)  20:58, May 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * Miles, my man, that is one character. More characters, more fun! What we need is someone who can take better quality snapshots.  BNK [ E 21:54, May 20, 2010 (UTC)

What's this mean?
What you said here. Toomai Glittershine  eXemplary Logic  The Stats Guy  The Table Designer  12:34, May 26, 2010 (UTC)
 * It's a meme from Home Improvement. Al would always say "I don't think so, Tim." whenever Tim did or said something stupid.  Kperfekt  Talk Is Cheap...   But I Am Not.  13:14, May 26, 2010 (UTC)

Wombo Combo 2
Why did u delete it, it was a fine article and there was nothing wrong with it? Doc King (talk) 20:28, June 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * lol
 * I didn't delete the article. In fact, it isn't fully gone. I simply made it redirect to a section of the Wombo Combo article.  BNK [ E 20:30, June 28, 2010 (UTC)


 * Wombo Combo 2 was deleted because it isn't notable enough to merit its own page, so the information about it is more suitable on the Wombo Combo page rather than being its own article. Omega   Tyrant  [[Image: TyranitarMS.png|25px ]] 20:33, June 28, 2010 (UTC)


 * Wait, can we still have the stuff that was on there be on the wombo combo page? Doc King (talk) 20:37, June 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * No. Too many instructions and the word "you".  BNK [ E 20:38, June 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * May I ask this but how come you guys always delete something that I make to help the site? I mean I'm just helping and you guys just delete it, how come? Doc King (talk) 20:43, June 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * Mostly because it isn't needed. I'm sure there are other fields which require your help.  BNK [ E 20:48, June 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * If there's an article that needs help, can you tell me because i would like to really help this wiki. Doc King (talk) 20:52, June 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * You can help by lengthening articles that are stubs, adding images to articles that need them, or improving articles that require clean-up (rewriting).  BNK [ E 20:58, June 28, 2010 (UTC)

My RFA
I guess, you're right, my failed RFA is affecting my behavior. When Shadowcrest said that if I wanted adminship, I should try to act well in conflicts. Those words effected me, and since then I have tried to resolve conflicts, and act calmer and how an admin should, as I plan to run again later. If I am acting inappropriatly, then what kind of attidute should I have? Also, how was I not contributing to that argument? I was involved, defending the new user, and while OT hasn't violated policies, he should have stuck to the guidelines better. Mr. Anon teh awsome 03:03, July 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * Your efforts to keep conflict to a minimum are appreciated, but not necessary. OmegaTyrant and Tuesday are having an argument over "clone standards". Within there walls are remarks and words that are offensive to a degree, but this is not erupting conflict; the two are having a debate that will likely last until either arguer concedes.
 * Sometimes, it is best to keep out of an argument, even if you feel one or both users are acting wrongly. I've made this mistake countless times before.
 * To answer your questions: You weren't contributing positively to the argument because a good percentage of what you said was telling OmegaTyrant to relieve himself of non-existent feelings of anger and to not be rude to Tuesday. You made comments regarding the clone article, but they're basically repeats and have been discussed in the past. Your attitude should be calm, collected, and patient. Include yourself in debates only when necessary. You aren't doing anything wrong, but on the track of becoming an administrator, you should avoid falsehoods and pointing the finger.  BNK  [ E 03:14, July 4, 2010 (UTC)

why
are you removing Template:Infobox Game? Yes, I know those articles are filled with irrelevant crap, but is there really a benefit to removing the infobox? Shadowcrest 02:49, July 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes. When someone is reading info on a game, they really don't need to know what year it came out (especially in each region), who developed it, etc. All they need to know the game's influence in the Super Smash Bros. series.  BNK [ E 02:51, July 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * I avoided the question. The benefit is that there is less wasted space (brackets, etc.) and there isn't much of a need for it other than for the Super Smash Bros. games, because information described in the box can easily be found at Wikipedia or that game's series' respective wiki.  BNK [ E 02:53, July 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * I disagree. When talking about a game, I feel that we should reference the year, as that does give insight into which of the smash bros games it may have influenced.  Yes, you could go to wikipedia for that, but something as simple as the year takes up virtually no space and gives important information.  Clarinet Hawk (talk · contributions) 02:59, July 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * That's fine, but other information isn't needed, and a whole box isn't necessary for just the date. We should mention the year somewhere at the top, to be honest. There is nothing else to tell about the game that is actually necessary. I'm already tolerant of box art, which I think, to an extent, is not necessary either. <font face="Eurostile" size="3"> BNK [ E 03:02, July 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * The infobox doesn't take up much space and frankly doesn't hurt. The year is relevant info; why put a sentence at the top to do something that there's already a built-in functionality for? Shadowcrest  03:24, July 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * It is, but what good would an infobox be if the only relevant info is the date? "Etc is a GameCube game released on July 10, 2000 that features [...]" looks fine, and is informative. <font face="Eurostile" size="3"> BNK [ E 03:38, July 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * It's not the only useful parameter. Title, image, possibly caption, publisher, series, platform, maybe even ratings... Shadowcrest  04:32, July 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * Publisher, ratings, and platform definitely aren't necessary, but the others are. <font face="Eurostile" size="3"> BNK [ E 04:37, July 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * I agree. We're not talking about something that takes up undo amounts of space.  We're talking about basic information that can more easily be given in a concise info box than by a link to wikipedia.  Clarinet Hawk (talk · contributions) 04:39, July 15, 2010 (UTC)